cwh
join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX | reply to brianiscool
Re: heh Just wait till the local stations start lowering bitrate so they can have multiple subchannels. |
|
ke4pymPremium
join:2004-07-24
Charlotte, NC Reviews:
 ·VOIPo
 ·Verizon Broadban..
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·Northland Cable ..
| Actually, this might not happen so much as you would think.
The FCC recently mandated that each sub channel (even if it is just weather radar) must present a certain amount of childrens programming. And, it must be counted seperately of the main channel's childrens programming content.
So, if the requirement is 20 hours a month for your main channel and you're running 3 sub channels you've now got to come up with an additional 60 hours of content.
Many of the stations in my market shut down their weather radar channel because of this requirement. |
|
cwh
join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX | Childrens programs can have advertisements too. I bet the shutdown is only long to find content and advertisers. It seems like a dumb requirement. |
|
 56403739Less than 5 months leftPremium
join:2006-03-08
Naples, FL
kudos:2 | reply to cwh
They already do it here (multiple subchannels) but the picture quality still beats the snot out of what Comcast squirts through their coax around here. And this is not a major market... |
|
ke4pymPremium
join:2004-07-24
Charlotte, NC Reviews:
·VOIPo
·Verizon Broadban..
·RoadRunner Cable
·Northland Cable ..
| reply to cwh
said by cwh:Childrens programs can have advertisements too. I bet the shutdown is only long to find content and advertisers. It seems like a dumb requirement. There are a lot of limitations for commercials during kid's programming. Depending on going rates, it might not even be worth it.
»www.fcc.gov/parents/commercials.html
»www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/childtv.html
I also have it on pretty good authority that those sub channels are gone for good (atleast on the stations in question here). |
|
cwh
join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX | Given that broadcasting a subchannel is very low cost, I cant see how it would not be worth while,even if you run the childrens programs at a loss. |
|
|
|
 HallPremium,MVM
join:2000-04-28
Dayton, OH
kudos:1 | reply to ke4pym
said by ke4pym: Many of the stations in my market shut down their weather radar channel because of this requirement. Only one of my local stations operates a weather channel and they started it up not long before the Jan 1, 2007 deadline for this children's programming requirement. It's still running today too.... |
|
| said by Hall:said by ke4pym: Many of the stations in my market shut down their weather radar channel because of this requirement. Only one of my local stations operates a weather channel and they started it up not long before the Jan 1, 2007 deadline for this children's programming requirement. It's still running today too.... I'll second that; I'm really glad they did too; while it's definitely not an exciting channel, I find it far more beneficial to watch and listen to that THE Weather Channel, but that's just me.
Either way, I really like my HD offering off of my antenna; all but one of my regular channels broadcasts in HD at some time during the week. |
|
JimFPremium
join:2003-06-15
Allentown, PA
1 edit | reply to cwh
But if it were worth it to run the children's programming before the requirement in order to earn the advertising revenue, they would have done it. The children's programming requirement can only reduce their incentive to run the sub-channel. |
|
TACSPEEDPremium
join:2001-04-14
Tacoma, WA | reply to ke4pym
I don't see where you come up with 20 hours per month. The FCC web site says 3 hours per week of core programing. Is the web site wrong?
»www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/childtv.html
In my area, no one has pulled the plug on local weather channel or the channel dedicated to a camera directed on the local airport.
--
Fiber Optics is the future of high-speed internet access. Stop by the BBR Fiber Optic Forum. |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000 | reply to JimF
now why would they do that? seriously. the FCC wouldn't do it willy nilly. does it screw over cableco's somehow and benefit telcos? |
|
robertflPremium
join:2005-10-10
Mary Esther, FL
1 edit | If I were to encounter a programme with E/I on it, it should be commercial free. Why the FCC is allowing commercials to be put in kid's programmes is beyond me.
What a way to get kids today introduced to "ads"
(skip)
(There misleading anyway)
Rob |
|
ricep5Premium
join:2000-08-07
Jacksonville, FL | reply to Fox McCloud
said by Fox McCloud:said by Hall:said by ke4pym: Many of the stations in my market shut down their weather radar channel because of this requirement. Only one of my local stations operates a weather channel and they started it up not long before the Jan 1, 2007 deadline for this children's programming requirement. It's still running today too.... I'll second that; I'm really glad they did too; while it's definitely not an exciting channel, I find it far more beneficial to watch and listen to that THE Weather Channel, but that's just me. Either way, I really like my HD offering off of my antenna; all but one of my regular channels broadcasts in HD at some time during the week. The Weather Channel has become a wasteland of enhanced weather "specials", most hosted by mr. superlative Jim Cantore. They were better when they stuck to just weather reporting and analysis instead of trying to make it a soap. |
|
wvcaverPremium
join:2005-04-17
Millersburg, OH | i used to watch them all the time!
now i would rather get my weather off of the internet! |
|
| reply to ricep5
yep; I completely agree; heck, I can remember when they didn't even have a weather man, or anyone talking on the channel; it was just a 24/7 radar view with elevator music. |
|
Time4aNAPPremium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL | reply to ricep5
Re: The Weather Channel Ironically, TWC's weather.com website is as good as TWC on cable is bad. |
|
 Subaru1-3-2-4Premium
join:2001-05-31
Greenwich, CT
·Packet8
 ·Verizon Online DSL
·AT&T Yahoo
·Optimum Online
·STANAPHONE
| reply to Fox McCloud
Re: heh said by Fox McCloud:yep; I completely agree; heck, I can remember when they didn't even have a weather man, or anyone talking on the channel; it was just a 24/7 radar view with elevator music. Ditto now everything I seem to turn it on it's some weather show or it seems like a news reporting channel.
I kid you not I used to have it turned to the channel 24/7
--
It's NOT Ni-kon It's NE-KON!
Check out my Gallery!
»/pics/dimaging/400265
|
|
 Michieru2zzz zzz zzzPremium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL | You are not the only one. |
|
| reply to 56403739
Same here and I hate it. Our ABC station has several subchannels, one a radar and the other "the CW". I wish they would at least turn off the radar (if there is no bad weather) during prime time ABC shows like they do in Dallas. |
|
 TopmounterSent By Grocery Clerks
join:2001-02-20
Evergreen, CO | reply to ke4pym
Oh good, great idea, kids need to watch MORE television  |
|
