cwh
join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX | reply to ke4pym
Re: heh Childrens programs can have advertisements too. I bet the shutdown is only long to find content and advertisers. It seems like a dumb requirement. |
|
ke4pymPremium
join:2004-07-24
Charlotte, NC Reviews:
 ·Verizon Broadban..
 ·VOIPo
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·Northland Cable ..
·Packet8
| said by cwh:Childrens programs can have advertisements too. I bet the shutdown is only long to find content and advertisers. It seems like a dumb requirement. There are a lot of limitations for commercials during kid's programming. Depending on going rates, it might not even be worth it.
»www.fcc.gov/parents/commercials.html
»www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/childtv.html
I also have it on pretty good authority that those sub channels are gone for good (atleast on the stations in question here). |
|
cwh
join:2006-05-14
San Antonio, TX | Given that broadcasting a subchannel is very low cost, I cant see how it would not be worth while,even if you run the childrens programs at a loss. |
|
JimFPremium
join:2003-06-15
Allentown, PA
1 edit | But if it were worth it to run the children's programming before the requirement in order to earn the advertising revenue, they would have done it. The children's programming requirement can only reduce their incentive to run the sub-channel. |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000 | now why would they do that? seriously. the FCC wouldn't do it willy nilly. does it screw over cableco's somehow and benefit telcos? |
|
robertflPremium
join:2005-10-10
Mary Esther, FL
1 edit | If I were to encounter a programme with E/I on it, it should be commercial free. Why the FCC is allowing commercials to be put in kid's programmes is beyond me.
What a way to get kids today introduced to "ads"
(skip)
(There misleading anyway)
Rob |
|
