Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » ISPs Employ 'Walled Gardens' To Limit Infection » sounds about right
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
159
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Well assuming cox got it right »
« Within reason  
AuthorAll Replies


goodwithbad

@pacbell.net
sounds about right

just upgrade to handle the traffic


wifi4milez
In Need Of Garbage Pail Kids 1st Series

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Interesting

Assuming they can correctly identify "infected" machines, I think this idea is good. My main (only) concern would be that the ISP would somehow flag a "normal" PC as infected and then quarantine it.
--
я люблю Денди!


blueeyesm

join:2003-09-05
Waterloo, ON
·Rogers Hi-Speed

Or worse,.. state in their AUP that bittorrent usage is not allowed. Then, set their network to detect bittorrent traffic (used legitimately), deem it against their policy, and limit the user to pages on their site about bittorrent use. Then, ask for the user to check the AUP, and have them call tech support to release their account once bittorrent traffic has ceased.


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
·Verizon FIOS

said by blueeyesm See Profile :

Or worse,.. state in their AUP that bittorrent usage is not allowed. Then, set their network to detect bittorrent traffic (used legitimately), deem it against their policy, and limit the user to pages on their site about bittorrent use. Then, ask for the user to check the AUP, and have them call tech support to release their account once bittorrent traffic has ceased.
Not that I would condone such actions, but if an ISP did that it would be perfectly within their rights in almost all circumstances. You are paying to use THEIR network. If THEY don't want something on THEIR network, it's THEIR choice, not yours. The extent of what you can do is find another provider.
--
Go Colts

battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
reply to goodwithbad
Re: sounds about right

You must work in marketing or sales.


Fatal Vector

join:2005-11-26

reply to cdru
Re: Interesting



Exactly right. YOU are PAYING them for the unrestricted use of their access network. Some here seem to use the idea of it being their network to justify any abuse of their customers, with the attitude that "they can do whatever they want. It's THEIR network".

They are being paid for access. To me, that means unrestricted access. Of course, if they crap on their customers in this manner, their customers will crap on them by taking business elsewhere, or, getting around their restrictions.


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
·Verizon FIOS

said by Fatal Vector See Profile :

They are being paid for access. To me, that means unrestricted access.
Every ISP I've ever seen has had a AUP and/or TOS that spells out what a user can, or in most cases can't do with the account. Almost every time there are two provisions, one that says a user's activities can not have a detrimental affect on the network and the other is that the policy may be changed without notice. You are NOT paying for unrestricted access. Heck, ISPs don't even get unrestricted access. They can and have been cut off from their upstream providers for violating policies.

I'm not saying it's right and that ISPs should just arbitrarily block a service just because it can be used for something illegitimate. I'm just saying that it is within their powers to do so.
--
Go Colts


Michieru
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL
reply to Fatal Vector
That's why there is 1 year contract exists just to piss those customers off even more.
--
The only limits we have are the one's we set ourselves.


Blasterbator
Sent By Grocery Clerks

join:2001-02-20
Jackson, MS
reply to wifi4milez
It's not hard at all to identify an infected machine.

It is nice to see an ISP actually be responsible and try to clean up their network, not to mention the Internet in general.
-
Forums » ISPs Employ 'Walled Gardens' To Limit InfectionWell assuming cox got it right »
« Within reason  


Wednesday, 20-Aug 08:33:52 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [87] Was FiOS a Good Idea?
· [77] Landscaping, Courtesy of AT&T?
· [52] Qwest, Unions Strike Deal
· [51] Google Launches White Space Broadband Website
· [49] Olympics Didn't Cause The Exaflood
· [47] AT&T Cooking Up New VoIP Product
· [44] First Android Phone Gets FCC Approval
· [44] Craig Moffett: Network Upgrades Are For Ninnies
· [38] 3G Data Cards Hot Among Soccer Moms (and Dads)
· [34] IPv6 Migration Not Happening
Most people now reading
· [Connectivity] Sandvine kills more than just P2P [Comcast HSI]
· Microsoft: Of Course We Spy On Our Web Users [Security]
· [Rant] comcast is too expensive for the poor [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Unsupported Computer Configuration [AT&T Southeast]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Neighbor Yanks a Power Line & Voltage Overloads the Block [Home Repair & Improvement]
· What is this? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· DIR-655 Firmware 1.20 Released [D-Link]
· [General] DLink VTA-VR [VOIP Tech Chat]