Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » ISPs Employ 'Walled Gardens' To Limit Infection » sounds about right
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Well assuming cox got it right »
« Within reason  

Fatal Vector

join:2005-11-26

Re: Interesting



Exactly right. YOU are PAYING them for the unrestricted use of their access network. Some here seem to use the idea of it being their network to justify any abuse of their customers, with the attitude that "they can do whatever they want. It's THEIR network".

They are being paid for access. To me, that means unrestricted access. Of course, if they crap on their customers in this manner, their customers will crap on them by taking business elsewhere, or, getting around their restrictions.

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

Re: Interesting

said by Fatal Vector See Profile :

They are being paid for access. To me, that means unrestricted access.
Every ISP I've ever seen has had a AUP and/or TOS that spells out what a user can, or in most cases can't do with the account. Almost every time there are two provisions, one that says a user's activities can not have a detrimental affect on the network and the other is that the policy may be changed without notice. You are NOT paying for unrestricted access. Heck, ISPs don't even get unrestricted access. They can and have been cut off from their upstream providers for violating policies.

I'm not saying it's right and that ISPs should just arbitrarily block a service just because it can be used for something illegitimate. I'm just saying that it is within their powers to do so.
--
Go Colts

Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL
That's why there is 1 year contract exists just to piss those customers off even more.
--
The only limits we have are the one's we set ourselves.
Forums » ISPs Employ 'Walled Gardens' To Limit InfectionWell assuming cox got it right »
« Within reason  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 10:20:15 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [56] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [22] AT&T Launching New 23 Mbps U-Verse Tier
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· Woo hoo for snow! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]