<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Well assuming cox got it right in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18260245</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:00:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:00:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Well assuming cox got it right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18263521</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637748"><b>David</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Tweak <A HREF="/useremail/u/641792"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Try spamhaus<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/networks.lasso" >www.spamhaus.org/statistics/networks.lasso</A><br><br>number 2    ;) <br>This case number 2 isn't anything to be proud of.<br>Why can't you get your boss's to shut these places down david?<br> </DIV>Well it's not like they don't know about them. I've been told before that they use Senderbase more than Spamhaus. Can't say I know why, I send them the list, although I do have to admit 2-4 years ago Spamhaus was up to about 141 of them for us and now today we sit at 60. It's an improvement but as to how far I am not sure. You would think that each spam reporting site would keep the same level of data but I am guessing not. <br><br>Then again I don't know where Senderbase or Spamhaus gets their information. <br><br>As for me, I can't really complain about 60, it's much better than the 141 years ago we had. I have also heard about some of those on our list are class C's that were sold to other network providers. So inherently it get's our name regardless. I am really curious how many of those 60 are farmed out to other providers. I would be willing to bet it's probably 10% or higher. <br><SMALL>--<br>If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this. <br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12602989~mode=flat">Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!<br></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18263521</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 13:30:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Well assuming cox got it right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18261333</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641792"><b>Tweak</b></A> : Try spamhaus<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/networks.lasso" >www.spamhaus.org/statistics/networks.lasso</A><br><br>number 2    ;) <br>This case number 2 isn't anything to be proud of.<br>Why can't you get your boss's to shut these places down david?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18261333</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:04:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Well assuming cox got it right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18260277</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637748"><b>David</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Tweak <A HREF="/useremail/u/641792"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>At&t should take a page from Internet providers that are taking proactive steps to protect the network. It might keep most of your mail servers from being black listed.<br> </DIV>Well if I go by these people I would say that "Polish telecom" seems to be in first place. but that's just a guess :)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.senderbase.org/" >www.senderbase.org/</A><br><SMALL>--<br>If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this. <br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12602989~mode=flat">Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!<br></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18260277</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:26:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Well assuming cox got it right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18260245</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641792"><b>Tweak</b></A> : At&t should take a page from Internet providers that are taking proactive steps to protect the network. It might keep most of your mail servers from being black listed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18260245</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:20:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Well assuming cox got it right</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18258812</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637748"><b>David</b></A> : this could be a rather interesting approach. Could benefit the ISP in a cost savings to the for them. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18258812</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:59:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
