| If they can contain the interference..... .....then go for it.
If they interfere with ANY radio service then it needs to be canned. |
|
|
|
| Consumers Energy (power co in Michigan) tried this before and was also reported about 2 yrs ago and the project dried up and died. I don't know what happened though if it were lack of interest or lake of management of the whole project itself. |
|
 GorbGuy
join:2003-09-23
Middleville, MI
 ·MEI.net
| This is Consumers Energy.
I, for one, can't wait. Since AT&T seems unwilling or unable to provide many in the area with broadband, this looks to be a promising alternative to satellite. Just hope they have worked out all of the interference issues.
--
Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect. Reboot now? |
|
| reply to moonpuppy
im glad there is a practical alternative to DSL and cable as well as FIOS in selected places.
i hope its deployed nationwide and up here in Canada. 3/3 sounds good to me. i would love to have 3Mbps upload. |
|
 pb5kCan't TriforcePremium
join:2005-11-16
Glendale, AZ | reply to moonpuppy
Agree completely.
But if they can work out the issues, I certainly wouldn't object to having competition for the cable and telcos. The symmetric upload potential is really interesting. I'm hoping for the best.
--
"When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.'" --
Theodore Roosevelt |
|
| reply to moonpuppy
I didnt even think BPL could get off the ground. If they can show the world that BPL is working without all the interference, they I say it SHOULD be our nation's supported broadband strategy.
Although, it is pretty sad that our nation supported a broadband method that had not even gotten off the ground to begin with.
--
- "Techie" Jim |
|
| reply to moonpuppy
Widespread high speed broadband > HAM radio |
|
| said by digitalfreak:Widespread high speed broadband > HAM radio Poor attempt at trolling. At least put some effort into it. |
|
| reply to GorbGuy
Verizon services grand ledge. The only people that can get the BPL are those in LOS (line of sight) with the transmission tower...which is only half the town. |
|
| reply to fgdsfg
Are you serious?...you would take BPL over Fios or Utopia style broadband?...Apparently you don't know what BPL really is (the range of LOS doesn't even cover my whole town). |
|
| reply to digitalfreak
Let me explain an issue that happened in my town a while back. There was a water district outside of the city doing some digging and they hit the main fiber trunk coming out of the city. Guess what happened? No outside phone, no cell phone, no internet. Unless you had satellite phone/internet you were screwed. There was no way for emergency services to get contacts out of the city. Guess who came to the rescue with an existing backup plan for something like this? The local Amateur Radio Emergency Services people. By using voice communications and digital communications; Yes, we have digital communications, amazing isn't it? We were able to at least have a communications backbone for those who needed it most. The FCC recognizes Amateur Radio as an important part of communications, heck, even the President has recognized Amateur Radio as an important part of communications. Let us continue to help others, but first, we need others to help us.
Supporting a failing broadband alternative is wrong. All these companies are trying to do is keep the revenue flow going but they are hanging by a thread. Even in a rural area, fiber and cable can be just as easily rolled out as BPL. Wireless broadband would be a more viable solution over BPL.
-KI6BBL aka CyberTrip |
|
