<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Riiiiight..... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18262644</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:42:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:42:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Riiiiight.....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18264295</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793283"><b>calvoiper</b></A> : The Baby Bells have a long history of using their equipment vendors to lobby for them.  I have little doubt that possible VZ purchases of Cisco equipment were mentioned in the same conversations that covered VZ's desire to kill this bill.<br><br>calvoiper<br><SMALL>--<br>VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18264295</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:37:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Riiiiight.....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18262708</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1130617"><b>deepblackmag</b></A> : HAHAHAHAHA wow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18262708</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:49:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Riiiiight.....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18262644</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : knowing cisco, bizarre sex.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18262644</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:35:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Riiiiight.....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18262441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939879"><b>openbox9</b></A> : <div class="bquote">Cisco is not selling a product or competing with current broadband providers, Schafer said, but rather lending its expertise to the state.</DIV>I don't know how much WV's bill to map broadband access would have cost the state, but it might have been nice to have those results. I find it very difficult to believe that Cisco will map out the state and provide a way-ahead with no strings attached and no monetary benefit to the company. I wonder when Cisco will expect that return of favor?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18262441</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:00:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
