republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

jsouth
Jsouth

join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS

reply to gatorkram

Re: Junk fax laws

That is the worst argument I have heard in a while. Their bandwidth is not used by linking. Only by clicking on that link and visiting their homepage is it used. You would think that they would want people to link to their homepage even if it crashes once in a while. That shows that people are interested in their company. As far as the Digg site example, what I would do is add more capacity so hopefully I can get new subscribers.
--
Bush bashing is old. How about more solutions instead?


gatorkram
KaBOOM Baby
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Winterville, NC
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Suddenlink

said by jsouth:

That is the worst argument I have heard in a while. Their bandwidth is not used by linking. Only by clicking on that link and visiting their homepage is it used. You would think that they would want people to link to their homepage even if it crashes once in a while. That shows that people are interested in their company. As far as the Digg site example, what I would do is add more capacity so hopefully I can get new subscribers.
Just because they don't use the link, doesn't mean it can't be used later to cause harm. If I don't want you giving out my fax number, but you give it out to a bunch of people, whats the difference?

They should have a right to control their own name. Maybe that is what it is about for them. I only tried to show an example why they might not want people posting links to their site.
--
Give me bandwidth or give me death!


Lumberjack
Premium
join:2003-01-18
Newport News, VA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

I can see how you could compare your website to a fax machine. Both have consumables (in terms of money). One is bandwidth that you pay for and the other is paper and a phone line. However you're analogy is incorrect in that the internet is public domain where-as a fax line is by default "private".

The difference however is that internet is public and a fax machine is private. Think of it like this. The internet is like public streets and the website is like a house or business. Some sites are like open shopping malls where you can go wherever you want. Other sites are like locked houses where you can only see a door and maybe a few other things on the outside unless you have a key and permission to enter.

Now, the fax machine is inside your house or your business. It isn't in that public realm. While you may know it's phone number and have the means to call it you must have permission or grant "public" permission (like posting the fax number generically). You also have the right to tell senders to your fax machine you do not want their spammy content. This is not determined by technology per-say but instead by law.

In the end law says you have to have some form of permission to send faxes to a recipient. There are no such laws (at least generically) to require you to have permission before viewing a web site. Based on this your analogy doesn't really hold up and you as a website owner agree that you are responsible for whom can see your website content based on your website configuration, not based on a set of laws (as with the fax machine).
--
»www.fairtax.org


Monday, 28-May 16:32:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics