Boozer
| reply to ColorBASIC
Re: Where's the comparison
said by ColorBASIC  : I wonder how much AT&T is spending total to deploy U-Verse. well according to the article they are spending $6.5B, so a little less than 1/3 what Verizon is spending. In the end they will probably wish they had just finished the job and gone all the way to the curb... |
|
telcolackey
The Truth? You can't handle the truth
join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA
2 edits | Verizon has spent 20 Biilllion dollars (pinky raised to mouth) for less than 7 million homes past (not customers)...
They have plans to get to 18M homes past. That additional spending is incremental on top of 20B.
Lot-o-$$ from those stock holders. |
|
ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA | reply to Boozer
The $6.5B is only through the end of next year. Certainly they will be deploying long past that. |
|
Onedollar
join:2001-08-27
Pomona, CA
| reply to telcolackey
said by telcolackey :Verizon has spent 20 Biilllion dollars (pinky raised to mouth) for less than 7 million homes past (not customers)... They have plans to get to 18M homes past. That additional spending is incremental on top of 20B. Lot-o-$$ from those stock holders. Where exactly do you see this 20 B already spent? No where do I see already spent. 20B is for the entire rollout. |
|
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
 ·Cox HSI
| reply to telcolackey
The difference is Verizon is spending their money wisely to invest long-term and in a future proof solution.
While at&t is IMHO wasting a lot of this money on a stop-gap measure that probably in the near future won't measure up to Cable and the likes of Verizon (and others) (If it even measures up now!) and in the end at&t will have to spend even more money to go back and finish the job.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
