republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast Cable At 150Mbps » Possible in a year or 2; not likely until 10 yrs from now
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Possible in a year or 2; not likely until 10 yrs from now

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Those kinds of speeds(100 mbps and up) to customers will be technically feasible in a year or two from US cable companies. But to make them widely available, infrastructure would have to be vastly updated, with numerous node splits in every neighborhood across the companies footprint. And that involves spending a great deal of money. Don't expect these speeds in most areas for up to 10yrs away.
Who knows maybe in 10 years people will need 100 Mbps. To be honest( and I'm a more speed the better guy ) who really needs 100 Mbps? Unless you're trying to download a bunch of blu-ray dvds. To stream something in 1080p would only take 16-20 Mbps. How many sites are going to do that?


Obliteration
Premium
join:2005-09-18
Somewhere

said by BF69 See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Those kinds of speeds(100 mbps and up) to customers will be technically feasible in a year or two from US cable companies. But to make them widely available, infrastructure would have to be vastly updated, with numerous node splits in every neighborhood across the companies footprint. And that involves spending a great deal of money. Don't expect these speeds in most areas for up to 10yrs away.
Who knows maybe in 10 years people will need 100 Mbps. To be honest( and I'm a more speed the better guy ) who really needs 100 Mbps? Unless you're trying to download a bunch of blu-ray dvds. To stream something in 1080p would only take 16-20 Mbps. How many sites are going to do that?
No, nobody really needs the 100Mbps at the moment but we currently could use speeds around 20Mbps down and more upload.

flytip

join:2007-04-06
Denver, CO
reply to BF69
said by BF69 :
who really needs 100 Mbps?
said by William Henry Gates III :
640K ought to be enough for anybody

mlundin

join:2001-03-27
Lawrence, KS
My thoughts exactly. Everybody who was using a 56k modem (if that) 10 years ago, raise your hand...


Elcabong
Cuba SI, Castro NO

join:2000-03-09
Philadelphia, PA
(raises hand)


dodgetech2

join:2002-01-01
Gouldsboro, PA
·ProLog
·Vonage

reply to mlundin
said by mlundin See Profile :

My thoughts exactly. Everybody who was using a 56k modem (if that) 10 years ago, raise your hand...
I remember when I took out my 14.4 modem and installed a a 56.6 modem.I was all excited to able to even connect at 33.6...:)

Man I was flying compared to my friends.....


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

Hell I remember when I jumped from 300 baud to 1200 baud.... and then later 2400 baud. Now that was impressive

2400 baud on a C-64 actually was pretty damn good

Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
·Verizon FIOS

100mbps widely dispersed to the population would allow you to do all the things on the internet that you just can't do now. Multiple HD streams to multiple PC's in single households, Centralized data storage, and application loading, truly integrated communications networks so you can answer your cell phone on your TV, and unlock your front door from your car. Single points of contact, so if you want to call someone the network finds them and routes the call correctly. Appliances that can reorder supplies, or update your grocery lists while your shopping as your kids eat your food. Wouldn't it be great if everytime someone rang your doorbell or opened your door you could have a live feed sent to your TV or cell phone to see who is entering or exiting your house? Utility control so thermostats automatically adjust based on your location, and lights turn on and off when needed. How much closer towards energy independence could we be if the majority of people didn't have their furnace's/ACs blasting away when they're at work, or out to eat, or out at all?

"Who needs 100mbps" is frankly an ignorant question.


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

I agree. I didn't say that, someone else did. For me the old WW1 Airman phrase "Speed is Life" sums up my opinion. More speed = more opportunities and options.

However I believe that even if they grant the speeds they will use the TOS as a tool to bludgeon people from being able to do anything too useful. (Such as host your own business.)
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
Yeah, I was just reply to the end of the thread because it makes it easier to read..

It was actually in response to BF69.


Yauch

join:2005-06-24
reply to flytip
*sigh* Never said it.


JaM4150
Premium
join:2005-10-27
Matamoras, PA
clubs:
reply to mlundin


furlonium
Computer Over? Virus equals Very Yes?

join:2002-05-08
Bethlehem, PA

reply to flytip
said by flytip See Profile :

said by BF69 :
who really needs 100 Mbps?
said by William Henry Gates III :
640K ought to be enough for anybody
I CRINGE every time someone says that played-out, worn quote. Yeah, back then it WAS enough, and it was damn expensive.
--
»www.myspace.com/intranet

I once had a dream that Sean Connery stayed at my apt., and he had his laptop with Win98 on it, and he knew how to connect to my wireless network. I don't do drugs


jimbo48

join:2000-11-17
Hayward, CA
·AT&T DSL Service
·EarthLink

reply to Ahrenl
This is all speculation and hype. Comcast only knows one thing and that is to raise your rates and not deliver anything for the rate hike. Their infrastucture is old and in disrepair in my locale and they have no intention in the near future to revitalize it because they have a lock on the franchise. In order to utiize this new technology,Comcast and the other ISP's will have to provide consistent, reliable service which in my case has been a mere pipe dream. the Internet service providers are infected with unethical business practices, inept technical support, lack of responsibility, lack of real customer service by rude and careless staff.


a333
A hot cup of integrals please

join:2007-06-12
Rego Park, NY
reply to Obliteration
U must upload a heck of a lot of porn, man.
Forums » Comcast Cable At 150Mbps


Friday, 04-Dec 14:50:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [119] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [99] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [78] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· LFM Overkill [World of Warcraft]
· Sprint to interface with Google Voice [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]