DevilOnE
Fozzie the buttplug, Vu the shitkicker
Premium
join:2003-12-12
Evansville, IN | reply to DevilOnE
Re: Too much bandwidth email....
i think my problem is that i have a spare computer in my garage that i store pictures and MP3s on and i access that computer at work to listen to music so that would be all upload. |
|
GLIMMER
join:2004-01-17
Urbana, IL | that would be a server and against the TOS and AUP..... So insight is well within there rights to limit you. Time to get a 2.5" HD and take it to work this is what I do now for this very reason |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
 ·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by GLIMMER  :that would be a server and against the TOS and AUP..... So insight is well within there rights to limit you. Time to get a 2.5" HD and take it to work this is what I do now for this very reason Curious. So Insight won't let you set up a computer so you can access it yourself? Even though you can configure said server so only you can access it?
I am glad I live in a region covered by an ISP with no such restriction. Cheaper than cable, too.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
GLIMMER
join:2004-01-17
Urbana, IL | cheaper and slower
that is the one thing dsl subs forget is that they payless and get less |
|
kalone
Premium
join:2002-07-02
Lexington, KY | I had dsl before cable and the "no server" was in Verizon's TOS. |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to GLIMMER
said by GLIMMER :cheaper and slower that is the one thing dsl subs forget is that they payless and get less No invisible caps. No prohibition of servers. 2GB mailboxes per email account. Up to 500 disposable email addresses per email account I've never needed more than 1.5 Meg down. I am not quite certain how I am getting "less" service.
It isn't a matter of "forgetting" anything; I know what I am getting. I know that it isn't worth the extra $30 per month I'd pay to double my download speed.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to kalone
said by kalone :I had dsl before cable and the "no server" was in Verizon's TOS. Ah, but I am not bound by the Verizon TOS. My provider has no explicit prohibition against running servers.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
GLIMMER
join:2004-01-17
Urbana, IL
| reply to NormanS
said by NormanS :said by GLIMMER :cheaper and slower that is the one thing dsl subs forget is that they payless and get less No invisible caps. No prohibition of servers. 2GB mailboxes per email account. Up to 500 disposable email addresses per email account I've never needed more than 1.5 Meg down. I am not quite certain how I am getting "less" service. It isn't a matter of "forgetting" anything; I know what I am getting. I know that it isn't worth the extra $30 per month I'd pay to double my download speed. DOUBLE YOUR SPEED? last time I checked 1.5+1.5=3 I have 10meg service that runs at 12meg which is 8 times faster than yours. So I do get more and I have 1 gig of email storage which is more than enough considering I store my email comp side. Last I checked att was selling there 1.5 dsl for 19.99 which is only 10bucks less. And ATT does monitor for some servers it is in there aup. |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by GLIMMER :DOUBLE YOUR SPEED? last time I checked 1.5+1.5=3 I have 10meg service that runs at 12meg which is 8 times faster than yours. So I do get more and I have 1 gig of email storage which is more than enough considering I store my email comp side. Last I checked att was selling there 1.5 dsl for 19.99 which is only 10bucks less. And ATT does monitor for some servers it is in there aup. I said, "I've never needed more than 1.5 Meg down". I never said I only had 1.5 Meg DSL service. I am paying $17.99 per month for "at&t Yahoo! HSI, Pro", which is 3008kbps/512kbps. After ATM overhead, about 2,500kbps down. Comcast only offers 4 Meg service for "naked" cable HSI, at $56.95 per month. Last I checked, 4 Meg is a tad short of double 2.5 Meg.
Comcast is all there is for cable HSI around here, and getting cable HSI plus Basic TV, while getting me their 6 Meg package, also means paying $13.41 for TV service I will never use; the landlady won't unhook her DirecTV, and I don't watch enough to run cable to my own set.
No Insight BB in the S.F. Bay Area; at least not at the south end of it.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
GLIMMER
join:2004-01-17
Urbana, IL | but you posted in the insight forum and I was relating to what we have not comcast and I believe some areas have 16mbit service with comcast now. |
|
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by GLIMMER :but you posted in the insight forum and I was relating to what we have not comcast and I believe some areas have 16mbit service with comcast now. I am surprised that Insight is so cheap. Given what people are paying for Comcast, TWC Road Runner, and were paying for Adelphia before it went under, I was under the impression that cable HSI was on the order of $40 per month, and up.
No 16M service in Comcast regions not going head to head against Verizon FIOS, AFAIK.
Oh, BTW, isn't Insight the company that sold off some of its holdings to Comcast?
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
GLIMMER
join:2004-01-17
Urbana, IL | yep in all IL markets and northern indiana. But its my understanding we get to keep what we have. |
|
