republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Making BPL Play Nice » Why not use PL tones?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
388
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« It's All Good  
AuthorAll Replies


dispatcher21

join:2004-01-22
united state
Why not use PL tones?

Why cant the radio guys just use PL tones to filter out the interference?


UHF
All static, all day, Forever
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-24
clubs:
How does adding a PL tone make the interference go away? It doesn't.


TechieZero
Tools Are Using Me
Premium
join:2002-01-25
Wesley Chapel, FL

reply to dispatcher21
said by dispatcher21 See Profile :

Why cant the radio guys just use PL tones to filter out the interference?
For fear of massive flame-age, you have a point. Maybe the Ham guys need to upgrade their methods if this is such an issue.

Not that I don't respect this activity, I think you guys are great.

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

said by TechieZero See Profile :

said by dispatcher21 See Profile :

Why cant the radio guys just use PL tones to filter out the interference?
For fear of massive flame-age, you have a point. Maybe the Ham guys need to upgrade their methods if this is such an issue.

Not that I don't respect this activity, I think you guys are great.
No, he doesn't have a point as both of you don't know how PL tones work. All PL tones do is open the squelch of a receiver when it receives the right sub-audible tone. This is useful ONLY when multiple people are using the same frequency or sporadic interference.

BPL interference is trying to listen to a regular conversation next to a car running with no muffler.

Try again.


AmnChode
Premium
join:2001-03-27
San Antonio, TX

reply to UHF
Exactly...PL tones/CTCSS doesn't filter interference. They filter out other traffic on the same channel. However, with the interference being caused, neither parties would be able to make contact (or at least be hindered in contact), thus making CTCSS null and void...

ie, CTCSS does not alleviate RF interference


dispatcher21

join:2004-01-22
united state


1 edit
reply to moonpuppy
I thought that what the problem was, sporadic interference? I did not know the interference was constant to the point of them not being able to communicate with their equipment. And yes, I know how PL tones work, we use them on our radios here and they filter out quite a bit of interfernece we get on our fire channel. With the PL tones off, we get a constant buzz and warble, we turn the PL tones on, the noise is completely gone. Whats causing the noise? We guess that its CSEPP across the river but the PL tones solve the problem for now till we can figure it out completely.


tenbase

join:2000-07-19
Alexandria, VA

HF communications are very different from typical VHF/UHF communications. Squelch is rarely used (and is not even included as a feature in many HF transceivers), as many of the signals are very weak and close to the noise floor.

PL/DCS is really only useful for local VHF/UHF communications where relative signal strength is high and there is no need to pick faint signals out of the muck.
--
I would kill everyone on this forum for a drop of sweet beer..


AmnChode
Premium
join:2001-03-27
San Antonio, TX

reply to dispatcher21
All the PL Tone does is tell the radio to "un-mute" when the tone is, for lack of better words, heard. Otherwise, the freq stays squelched. This works great if everyone uses the same freq, the same tone, and you can guarantee that you are in range of the contact without interference being an issue. It also keeps the radio nice and quiet when not being used.

However, when we are talking long distance contacts, which HAMs are more likely to deal with, you can't hear the contact or the tone over the interference, thus nullifying CTCSS tones. This is neglecting the fact that they would be searching for unknown contacts, to begin with. As such, they would not be squelching the radio purposely.

However, I believe what goes to the heart of the issue is that HAMs have to operate within specific guidelines and part of those guidelines is that they do not interfere with others traffic. Yet, at the same time, the FCC was allowing BPL to interfere with theirs, thus narrowing their radio spectrum even further.

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to dispatcher21
said by dispatcher21 See Profile :

I thought that what the problem was, sporadic interference? I did not know the interference was constant to the point of them not being able to communicate with their equipment. And yes, I know how PL tones work, we use them on our radios here and they filter out quite a bit of interference we get on our fire channel. With the PL tones off, we get a constant buzz and warble, we turn the PL tones on, the noise is completely gone. Whats causing the noise? We guess that its CSEPP across the river but the PL tones solve the problem for now till we can figure it out completely.
The interference of BPL is similar to what you are describing with CSEPP. Not only is it constant but much stronger and over a much greater frequency range.

As for the noise problem you are having, there are several possible reasons; bad transmitter, signals mixing, harmonics, etc.

MZR

join:2006-08-12
TX

reply to dispatcher21
said by dispatcher21 See Profile :

Whats causing the noise? We guess that its CSEPP across the river but the PL tones solve the problem for now till we can figure it out completely.
Pager systems....


TechieZero
Tools Are Using Me
Premium
join:2002-01-25
Wesley Chapel, FL

reply to moonpuppy
said by moonpuppy See Profile :

No, he doesn't have a point as both of you don't know how PL tones work. All PL tones do is open the squelch of a receiver when it receives the right sub-audible tone. This is useful ONLY when multiple people are using the same frequency or sporadic interference.

BPL interference is trying to listen to a regular conversation next to a car running with no muffler.

Try again.
I wasn't claiming I know how "PL tones" work and my remark was a general one; as in Ham operators might have to step up to the challenges some way some how.


AmnChode
Premium
join:2001-03-27
San Antonio, TX
They are. They are trying to stop the interference.
Forums » Making BPL Play Nice« It's All Good  


Saturday, 05-Dec 06:23:32 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [90] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· ZR1 VS The USN Blue Angels! [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]