 woody7Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA | hmmmmm..... Isn't this an instant that the "FCC" should have "intervened" on behalf or the city? If the voters approved the project, than they understand the "risks" involved. I think Lafayette should go after the "citizens" behind the lawsuits for damages and lawyer fees and other court costs, seeing how they lost at the supreme court level. This might make the "citizens" think about their actions in the future...JMT
--
BlooMe |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | Legal fees covered by a corporation on the behalf of a citizen should be taxable. That would clean-up the whole mess. Send in the IRS, they'll figure it out.. and they have tanks! |
|
|
|
 calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA | reply to woody7
said by woody7:Isn't this an instant that the "FCC" should have "intervened" on behalf or the city? ... What grounds exist for the FCC to get involved here? This is a fight in state court over state law, without federal involvement.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
