how-to block ads
|
Chaoswar
Premium
join:2002-09-23
Northlake IL | Re: They should be bonded and insured Maybe they could get a ground scan done before they excavate? I can't imagine that being more expensive than fixing the damage afterwards.... Or loss of life re: house fires... | |
|  
AMDUSER
Premium
join:2003-05-28
Earth
clubs: | Re: They should be bonded and insured Generally they have the utility marking service come out and mark where the gas, electric etc is located.
..However, it would not be too surprising if it was not marked due to old outdated maps. | |
| | RJ44
join:2001-10-19
Nashville, TN
| said by Chaoswar  :Maybe they could get a ground scan done before they excavate? What, exactly, is a ground scan? | |
| | | | | RJ44
join:2001-10-19
Nashville, TN
| Re: They should be bonded and insured said by Tursiops_G :said by Chaoswar :What, exactly, is a ground scan? Checking for the presence of buried utilities with ground-penetrating radar (more effective than using a plain Metal Detector)  » www.geomodel.com/ -Tursiops_G. I see, that's great stuff. Somehow though, I expect it costs just a bit more than they're paying for locations today.
BTW, that was me who asked, the quote got mixed up. | |
| | | | 
Tursiops_G
Technoid
Premium,MVM
join:2002-02-06
Norwalk, CT
clubs: | Re: They should be bonded and insured Oops, Sorry... 
-Tursiops_G. | |
| | | | Time4aNAP
Premium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL
| said by RJ44 :I see, that's great stuff. Somehow though, I expect it costs just a bit more than they're paying for locations today. Even if ground-penetrating RADAR is too costly for now, an amped-up version of a plain ol' metal detector can be used. I say "amped-up" because the utilities should have a much better idea of what they're looking for. Therefore their equipment can be optimized to find the specific metals (Cu, Fe, Pb), and at greater depths. | |
| | | | | Claybraker
join:2002-04-13
none
| Re: They should be bonded and insured said by Time4aNAP :said by RJ44 :I see, that's great stuff. Somehow though, I expect it costs just a bit more than they're paying for locations today. Even if ground-penetrating RADAR is too costly for now, an amped-up version of a plain ol' metal detector can be used. I say "amped-up" because the utilities should have a much better idea of what they're looking for. Therefore their equipment can be optimized to find the specific metals (Cu, Fe, Pb), and at greater depths. Finding metals underground isn't a problem. Figuring out which of the underground cables is live, and which are abandoned is. | |
| | | |
|
·
·
·