RJ44
join:2001-10-19
Nashville, TN | reply to Tursiops_G
Re: They should be bonded and insured said by Tursiops_G:said by Chaoswar:What, exactly, is a ground scan? Checking for the presence of buried utilities with ground-penetrating radar (more effective than using a plain Metal Detector)  » www.geomodel.com/ -Tursiops_G. I see, that's great stuff. Somehow though, I expect it costs just a bit more than they're paying for locations today.
BTW, that was me who asked, the quote got mixed up. |
|
 Tursiops_GTechnoidPremium,MVM
join:2002-02-06
Norwalk, CT | Oops, Sorry... 
-Tursiops_G. |
|
Time4aNAPPremium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL | reply to RJ44
said by RJ44:I see, that's great stuff. Somehow though, I expect it costs just a bit more than they're paying for locations today. Even if ground-penetrating RADAR is too costly for now, an amped-up version of a plain ol' metal detector can be used. I say "amped-up" because the utilities should have a much better idea of what they're looking for. Therefore their equipment can be optimized to find the specific metals (Cu, Fe, Pb), and at greater depths. |
|
| said by Time4aNAP:said by RJ44:I see, that's great stuff. Somehow though, I expect it costs just a bit more than they're paying for locations today. Even if ground-penetrating RADAR is too costly for now, an amped-up version of a plain ol' metal detector can be used. I say "amped-up" because the utilities should have a much better idea of what they're looking for. Therefore their equipment can be optimized to find the specific metals (Cu, Fe, Pb), and at greater depths. Finding metals underground isn't a problem. Figuring out which of the underground cables is live, and which are abandoned is. |
|
