nixenRockin' the BoxenPremium
|reply to lesopp |
Re: Data collection rules need upgrading; but 2/1 for BB doesn't
said by lesopp:Which is why I gave a formula-based definition as an example.
It has nothing to do with commerce, which existed before there was a definition, it continued to exist with the current lame definition and it will continue to exist regardless of any congressional definition. Once they set the definition it will likely never change and 20 years from now there will be more political battles. Moving this into the realm of the IETF would depoliticize it.
I disagree that it not in their charter. Here's their mission statement:
said by lesopp:However, nowhere in the above-quoted charter do they mention policy. They attempt to keep things as tech-oriented and neutral as any standards body is likely to succeed in doing. Taking on policy automatically invalidates neutrality.
The mission of the IETF is to produce high quality, relevant technical and engineering documents that influence the way people design, use, and manage the Internet in such a way as to make the Internet work better. These documents include protocol standards, best current practices, and informational documents of various kinds.
Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets.