republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
230
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

KnightAR

join:2004-04-22
San Marcos, CA

Meh

Hearing all these companies setting unreasonably low download caps makes me happy to be with Cox.


ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA

No kidding...suddenly a rarely enforced 40GB monthly cap looks like a gift.


KnightAR

join:2004-04-22
San Marcos, CA

I haven't heard any enforcement of this policy by Cox myself. I've had times before & after the policy was announced that I've gone over 500GB down in a month, and Cox didn't say a thing.



dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

"Before April 18, HughesNET customers on the Professional tier could download up to 350MB in a four hour period. They've since been restricted to 375MB over a 24 hour period, after which their connections are throttled to marginally usable status for 24 hours (this used to be 12)"
-
This sound akin to users on cable loaded nodes. its cheaper to cap than to beef up your network.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth



ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA

reply to KnightAR
I had Cox@Home from 1996-mid 2001 and got 2 letters during that time. But I haven't seen anyone get a letter from Cox since they took over their own service. I also have friends with Cox-OC who are over their caps every month and never hear anything from Cox.


Monday, 28-May 14:15:50 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics