TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to ColorBASIC
Re: I drop them over that and the rip-off
said by ColorBASIC  :Then call every 2 months and use other DNS servers unless you have a good alternative available. Use your own PC based DNS service. I use treewalk to handle my DNS needs. It has worked without any problems for the last year. »www.ntcanuck.com/
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA | As far as DNS goes, it's one the of few things Verizon does right. |
|
GlennAllen
join:2002-11-17
Richmond, VA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to TKJunkMail
TreeWalk is great; I've been using it for quite a few years. Simply installing it, however, won't help someone much with this kind of stuff. TreeWalk will simply cache your successful lookups so that if/when your regular DNS server availability becomes "problematic", you'll still be able to find the sites you've visited before. New lookups will still go out to the next level DNS (the default being whatever you were using when you installed TreeWalk), and, as you'd expect, unsuccessful lookups--which is what you'd have here--won't be cached. Now, you could both install TreeWalk and point it to a higher level--or "real"--DNS to bypass DNS "redirection" sites and to avoid other non-spec DNS problems.
I don't know... does it really matter? If they're redirecting only browser requests, probably not. If they're screwing up non-browser requests, then probably so.
Either way, using something like TreeWalk is usually a good idea.
--
Wherever you go, there you are. |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
 ·Speakeasy
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :said by ColorBASIC :Then call every 2 months and use other DNS servers unless you have a good alternative available. Use your own PC based DNS service. I use treewalk to handle my DNS needs. It has worked without any problems for the last year. » www.ntcanuck.com/ All of which assumes a provider never decides to do a transparent proxy of port 53. One of them will eventually try that.
--
Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets. |
|
zerog
join:2002-02-10
Dallas, TX
1 edit | it will likely come with the "save the children" package of internet restriction tools designed to filter out porn and meds sites...
btw.. Transparent DNS redirection will most certainly break LOTS of stuff... |
|
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
| reply to nixen
said by nixen :said by TKJunkMail :said by ColorBASIC :Then call every 2 months and use other DNS servers unless you have a good alternative available. Use your own PC based DNS service. I use treewalk to handle my DNS needs. It has worked without any problems for the last year. » www.ntcanuck.com/ All of which assumes a provider never decides to do a transparent proxy of port 53. One of them will eventually try that. A provider cant filter/block ports on the LOCAL side, only at the modem.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| said by dvd536 :A provider cant filter/block ports on the LOCAL side, only at the modem. And...?
If your access to the Internet-at-large goes through my networks, I can do whatever the hell I want to your traffic. So, even if you point your DNS entries to OpenDNS, I can still redirect them to my DNS servers. So, do what you want inside your LAN, I really don't care. But, the moment you're sending packets beyond your LAN, they're mine to do with as I please.
--
Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets. |
|
