Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Wi-Fi Health Fears Unfounded » Scientific fact > hysteria
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
What is wrong with the BBC? »
« Stupid  
AuthorAll Replies


Anubis Prime

join:2001-06-01
Indianola, PA
·Comcast

reply to CrazyFingers
Re: Scientific fact > hysteria

AND...I suppose we with our combustion engines, etc. are causing the temperature on Mars and the rest of the solar system to rise in unison.

Most people have no doubt that global warming is happening. We just disagree with the largely unproven notion that mankind is the major contributor to the problem. I would more believe that the great ball of burning gas in the sky has a great bit of culpability. Really, IMHO (and that's all it is) the population is starting to grow wise to this scam being perpetrated upon us. This is why there is such a big media push behind the global warming movement. (One last hurrah before global cooling begins. AND that would be a disaster because then many of these radical far-left leaning organizations would not be able to control CO2 production--thus not be able to control the means of production. For in an industrialized nation, there are very few economic activities that do not produce CO2. Poor Al Gore wouldn't be able to sell any carbon credits.)
Time's almost up... and time will tell.

I also love those graphs depicting rising CO2 levels and their effect on temperature (PSST...what they don't tell you is they are backwards on cause and effect. With higher temperatures come higher CO2 measurements, not the other way around--a bit "Inconvenient" for some people.)

Wow--another thought: Water vapor is a major greenhouse gas. How do we stop water from evaporating?

For some it is a way to make us, as a civilization, feel important somehow when really we are just specks of dust along for the ride. OR is there a bigger more sinister reason that is oblivious to even those who are followers to the cause? There is a true Lord of the Sith--and it's not the bumbling dolt known as George Bush. He is the financier of all things left. His first name though, is also George.

AND for the last time: CO2 is not a pollutant--it's plant food!
--
The most dangerous place in America to be is a "Gun-Free Zone". We protect our money with armed guards...How about our schoolchildren?


karthwyne

join:2003-04-27
Atlanta, GA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to DufiefData
i don't know if you realize that is the first article that was posted for the "no such thing as global warming" earlier, but it does not reference any actual studies.

but regardless, his argument is flawed. yes, without greenhouse gases the planet would be just like outer space, scorching on the sun facing side, and almost absolute zero on the dark side (that's -459.67°F), so if we take a temperature range of 500°, that means that even his admitted numbers add up to a change of +1.395°. that kind of temperature change in the ocean means 10x the number and violence of storms. I don't believe that his numbers are realistic though.

besides, his argument is like saying that adding adding a drop of ricin to a glass of pure water is harmless because it is still 99.999% water.

DufiefData

join:2006-06-13
Gaithersburg, MD

reply to karthwyne
Maybe global warming is happening. Maybe it's not. Here's a perspective from a climate scientist in New Zealand:

Global warming debunked
By ANDREW SWALLOW - The Timaru Herald | Saturday, 19 May 2007

Climate change will be considered a joke in five years time, meteorologist Augie Auer told the annual meeting of Mid Canterbury Federated Farmers in Ashburton this week.

Man's contribution to the greenhouse gases was so small we couldn't change the climate if we tried, he maintained.

"It is time to attack the myth of global warming," he said.

Water vapour was responsible for 95 per cent of the greenhouse effect, an effect which was vital to keep the world warm, he explained.
.....
The other greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen dioxide, and various others including CFCs, contributed only five per cent of the effect, carbon dioxide being by far the greatest contributor at 3.6 per cent.

However, carbon dioxide as a result of man's activities was only 3.2 per cent of that, hence only 0.12 per cent of the greenhouse gases in total. Human-related methane, nitrogen dioxide and CFCs etc made similarly minuscule contributions to the effect: 0.066, 0.047 and 0.046 per cent respectively.
.....
"We couldn't do it (change the climate) even if we wanted to because water vapour dominates."
......
"It's become a witch-hunt; a Salem witch-hunt," he said.


CrazyFingers

join:2003-10-01
Columbia, MO
reply to pnh102
Well, as long as you don't take the nukular option...
--
Burrow owl...burrow owl...


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to CrazyFingers
said by CrazyFingers See Profile :

I over-estimated you.
You misunderestimated me
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.


CrazyFingers

join:2003-10-01
Columbia, MO
reply to pnh102
*sigh*...

I had hoped that the sarcasm in the second sentence would have made the same in the first sentence obvious.
I over-estimated you. I'm sorry, I promise it won't happen again.
--
Burrow owl...burrow owl...


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to CrazyFingers
said by CrazyFingers See Profile :

Now now pnh106 (sic), we both know that is an absurd statement.
Why? You just said the same thing about the "scientists" of old. I am extending your statement to the scientists of new. Science certainly isn't dead as an academic discipline, and for us to assume that we "know everything" is silly and dangerous. To quote one such scientist, "we do not know, what we don't know."

My main problem with simply "going with the consensus" on any subject is that it discourages academic review. It is just as bad as answering every scientific question with the response "God did it." Without review and challenging of accepted scientific principles, how will we know that they are valid or not?
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.


CrazyFingers

join:2003-10-01
Columbia, MO
reply to pnh102
Now now pnh106, we both know that is an absurd statement.

We'll all be dead in 500 years after the arctic icecaps melt and the polar bears descend on us in a feeding frenzy.
--
Burrow owl...burrow owl...


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to CrazyFingers
said by CrazyFingers See Profile :

Sorry, but 500 years ago, there was nobody that could even remotely be considered a "scientist" by modern standards.
And how can you say that someone who is a scientist today by modern standards will be looked upon as such 500 years from now?
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.


karthwyne

join:2003-04-27
Atlanta, GA
·AT&T Southeast


2 edits
reply to jester121
actually, i have never heard that as a reason to believe in global warming, only the bush administration, ie your .gov website, has used that tactic to say why we shouldn't.

personally i like to follow the scientific method and base ideas on logic and fact.
like the ice core samples that show we should be on a cooling cycle in global temperature based on historical record and instead are warming.
like the fact that the polar ice caps are forming 2+ weeks later than they used to, and melting 2+ weeks sooner killing numerous polar bears by starvation.

or in response to the volcano argument, yes, there have been volcano eruptions, and eruptions that caused massive global warming and mass extinction, but we also had 2x the amount of rain forest, and probably a good 100x the amount of temperate forest. just compare the temperatures in a city with the country and you will see the affects man has made on a smaller scale. when europeans first made it to north america, it is said a squirrel could traverse from the atlantic to the pacific without touching the ground as the continent was covered in forests.

and to the guy in black mountain, NC, i'm sure you can smell the paper factory in canton some days, you think that is natural? would you rather drink the water upstream or downstream from them?


CrazyFingers

join:2003-10-01
Columbia, MO

reply to pnh102
Sorry, but 500 years ago, there was nobody that could even remotely be considered a "scientist" by modern standards. Those who tried were typically threatened with a nice dry stack of kindling until they "remembered" that the sun orbited the Earth and witches floated because they were made of wood.
--
Burrow owl...burrow owl...


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to jester121
said by jester121 See Profile :

Aren't we told over and over that climate change is a fact, because "all the world's top scientists believe it"?
Heh... wasn't it only 500 years ago that all of the world's top scientists were telling us that the world was flat too?
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk.

jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·surpasshosting
·ViaTalk

reply to karthwyne
said by karthwyne See Profile :

...and a list of people who believe a certain thing does not make it so, however much you might wish it did.
Sorry, I have to get the buzzer out now. Aren't we told over and over that climate change is a fact, because "all the world's top scientists believe it"?

You've illustrated my point perfectly, thanks.
Forums » Wi-Fi Health Fears UnfoundedWhat is wrong with the BBC? »
« Stupid  


Saturday, 05-Dec 09:55:32 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [94] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [84] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [ Billing] Modem rental price increase [Comcast HSI]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Road Runnner up to 50 mbps is ready ! [Road Runner]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ZR1 VS The USN Blue Angels! [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]