insomniac84
join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
| What is wrong with the BBC?
The whole time I was waiting for them to come out and call all those people nuts, but they seem to actually think those crazy people have merit. Especially with the nut case with tin foil all over her walls. They should have taken her into a house and claimed it had protective paint when it didn't. Her symptoms would have still gone away. |
|
rasmasyean
@rr.com
| Well if you think about it, the molecular bonds in protein and DNA and even neuron signals are electrical-charge based. So it’s not entirely “un-scientific” to have caution. The fact that an electro-encephalogram exists states enough. So it IS possible to alter the molecular bonding behavior via some type of EM disturbance.
However, since WiFi goes like barely 300 feet while cell-phones go miles and you hold them next to your head…the concern is most likely misplaced if anything. And they have done “penetration tests” with various cell-phones and most don’t penetrate deep enough to be of concern. But does it affect the skin??? Who knows? It also depends on the wavelength too so it’s really complicated and at this point, we don’t know the answers. But overall, the potential harms don’t outweigh the benefits (so far at least). Cars kill an outrageous number of people…but does that mean we should eliminate cars? |
|
