<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Looks like it will hurt big time.. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18419649</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:32:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:32:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Looks like it will hurt big time..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18424168</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637748"><b>David</b></A> : Well looks like at&t is covered.. :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18424168</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 03:04:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Looks like it will hurt big time..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18419649</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/540297"><b>Mactron</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18939574/" >www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18939574/</A><br><I><br>Filings suggest that Qualcomm may need as much as two years to create a replacement technology bypassing Broadcom's patent. Not even Broadcom would be able to fill the void, says AT&T: "Handset offerings for 2007 have already been finalized for testing and launch, and none of these offerings includes handsets with Broadcom's chips," AT&T said in its May 18 filing.<br></I><br><SMALL>--<br><B><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/23494z">If only the Verizon CSRs worked  this well.</B> ;)</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18419649</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:49:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
