Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference? » True
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
105
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

W1RFI

join:2003-05-12
Burlington, CT

reply to calvoiper
Re: True

> Anybody got any results from any "long-haul" trials of
> BPL?

In central VA, IBEC (a BPL manufacturer) and the local rural cooperative are running a commercial BPL deployment. They have reported that they are sending a BPL signal down 13 miles of overhead lines, using repeaters, of course. The repeaters are purportedly as much as a mile apart, but a deployment map that shows the locations of the units shows the typical 1000 feet or so as the spacing for most of them. I have no specific data on any testing, although having talked with a couple of users there, they have been generally satisfied with the performance. One user complained about reliability.

With rural lines, they can generally go farther along the line than they can do in urban environs. There are far fewer transformers, taps and other lossy configurations, if they can clean up all the power-line noise.

Ed Hare, W1RFI


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

reply to Transmaster
said by Transmaster See Profile :

... and they are still fantasising the it will be the rural provider.

Yeah, and the really annoying thing is that they end up with "demo" projects that all use BPL for "last mile" connections in urban areas, while people don't realize that trying to use it over long distances in rural areas is a wholly different application.

Why is rural different? Well, when you are cramming a broadband signal down a wire designed for something other than broadband, there are significant losses with increasing distance. (Hint: consider DSL.) Additionally, there are transformers to consider, and the wire cable is even less suited to high-frequency transmission than twisted pair copper. (Yes, I know you thought that wasn't possible, but it is.)

Anybody got any results from any "long-haul" trials of BPL?

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!


ShadowMastr
Master Of All Shadows

join:2001-09-01
Fort Pierce, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·Comcast
·CenturyLink

reply to Topmounter
Re: True... NOT

said by Topmounter See Profile :

Define competition...

Every state where I've lived or have friends in in recent years has DSL, Cable Modem and Wireless service available (satellite is also available, but I'd have to be pretty desperate to consider that a viable option).
Your statement is very partially true..... every state may have 1 or more of those options in *A* part of the state, but there is NO state that has one or more of those options in *EVERY* part of the state.

There are a HUGE amount of areas where there is zero broadband options still, and it will continue this way because so many people in the non rural areas just can't comprehend why 'farmers' need broadband anyway..... can't seem to understand that 'farmers' are a small portion of rural settlers.....

What ever happened to the dream of working from home, no matter where you live?? I'm doing so in the Ozarks in Arkansas, but because I don't want to live in a 'city' or 'town', I have to do so with dialup.....

Satellite doesn't count, that only works if you want to pay a large monthly fee to get email and surf websites occasionally, most times at slower speeds than dialup....
--
Follow Your Bliss -- Joseph Cambell


Topmounter
Sent By Grocery Clerks

join:2001-02-20
Evergreen, CO
reply to nasadude
Re: True

Define competition...

Every state where I've lived or have friends in in recent years has DSL, Cable Modem and Wireless service available (satellite is also available, but I'd have to be pretty desperate to consider that a viable option).

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
reply to Transmaster
the FCC needs BPL to be a "viable competitor" in the broadband space so they can continue to spout the fiction that there is "broadband competition" in the U.S.


Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
·Qwest.net

Yes this is true the FCC continues to blow off the interference issue. They continue to flatulate about BPL being a major provider and they are still fantasising the it will be the rural provider.
--
Remember safe sex does not prevent crabs.
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference?


Saturday, 28-Nov 17:03:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [62] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DIR-655 New Beta 1.32b09 [D-Link]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Gizmo5 has added a Google Voice section in its members area. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Why would I want an e reader? [General Questions]
· [OOL] OOL throttling streaming videos? [OptimumOnline]
· Keep sbcglobal.net or att.net email address after DSL cancel [AT&T West]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]