Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference? » True
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
reply to Transmaster
Re: True

the FCC needs BPL to be a "viable competitor" in the broadband space so they can continue to spout the fiction that there is "broadband competition" in the U.S.


Topmounter
Sent By Grocery Clerks

join:2001-02-20
Evergreen, CO
Define competition...

Every state where I've lived or have friends in in recent years has DSL, Cable Modem and Wireless service available (satellite is also available, but I'd have to be pretty desperate to consider that a viable option).


ShadowMastr
Master Of All Shadows

join:2001-09-01
Fort Pierce, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·Comcast
·CenturyLink

Re: True... NOT

said by Topmounter See Profile :

Define competition...

Every state where I've lived or have friends in in recent years has DSL, Cable Modem and Wireless service available (satellite is also available, but I'd have to be pretty desperate to consider that a viable option).
Your statement is very partially true..... every state may have 1 or more of those options in *A* part of the state, but there is NO state that has one or more of those options in *EVERY* part of the state.

There are a HUGE amount of areas where there is zero broadband options still, and it will continue this way because so many people in the non rural areas just can't comprehend why 'farmers' need broadband anyway..... can't seem to understand that 'farmers' are a small portion of rural settlers.....

What ever happened to the dream of working from home, no matter where you live?? I'm doing so in the Ozarks in Arkansas, but because I don't want to live in a 'city' or 'town', I have to do so with dialup.....

Satellite doesn't count, that only works if you want to pay a large monthly fee to get email and surf websites occasionally, most times at slower speeds than dialup....
--
Follow Your Bliss -- Joseph Cambell
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference?


Sunday, 29-Nov 01:44:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [73] Weekend Open Thread
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· netTalk tk6000 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Anyone have a problem [Software]