republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference? » True
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: True

said by Transmaster See Profile :

... and they are still fantasising the it will be the rural provider.

Yeah, and the really annoying thing is that they end up with "demo" projects that all use BPL for "last mile" connections in urban areas, while people don't realize that trying to use it over long distances in rural areas is a wholly different application.

Why is rural different? Well, when you are cramming a broadband signal down a wire designed for something other than broadband, there are significant losses with increasing distance. (Hint: consider DSL.) Additionally, there are transformers to consider, and the wire cable is even less suited to high-frequency transmission than twisted pair copper. (Yes, I know you thought that wasn't possible, but it is.)

Anybody got any results from any "long-haul" trials of BPL?

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
W1RFI

join:2003-05-12
Burlington, CT

Re: True

> Anybody got any results from any "long-haul" trials of
> BPL?

In central VA, IBEC (a BPL manufacturer) and the local rural cooperative are running a commercial BPL deployment. They have reported that they are sending a BPL signal down 13 miles of overhead lines, using repeaters, of course. The repeaters are purportedly as much as a mile apart, but a deployment map that shows the locations of the units shows the typical 1000 feet or so as the spacing for most of them. I have no specific data on any testing, although having talked with a couple of users there, they have been generally satisfied with the performance. One user complained about reliability.

With rural lines, they can generally go farther along the line than they can do in urban environs. There are far fewer transformers, taps and other lossy configurations, if they can clean up all the power-line noise.

Ed Hare, W1RFI
Forums » FCC Ignoring BPL Interference?


Saturday, 05-Dec 20:18:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [110] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· delete [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Can I put insulation behind wires from panel? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]