<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: BPL is good for me,me me me me me in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18467097</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:02:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:02:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: BPL is good for me,me me me me me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18470767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1123828"><b>N3EVL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by somewarez :</SMALL><BR><BR>...upgrade to digital and you wont need your analog toys...<br> </DIV>I want to hear the science and the engineering behind this statement - what exactly is it that your proposed "upgrade" to digital offers that will permit the reception of HF signals that are otherwise unreadable in the presence of BPL interference?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18470767</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:05:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: BPL is good for me,me me me me me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18469059</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/165405"><b>drjim</b></A> : too-shay! I'll give you that one!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18469059</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:11:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: BPL is good for me,me me me me me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18468947</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/540297"><b>Mactron</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  drjim <A HREF="/useremail/u/165405"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Why do we even bother allowing anon morons to post here when they obviously don't know what they're talking about?<br> </DIV>Well they are kind of funny in their own way sometimes.  ;) As "somewarez" proved with that post. Lack of education and/or common sense is the killer.   :p<br><SMALL>--<br><B><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/23494z">If only the Verizon CSRs worked  this well.</B> ;)</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18468947</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:53:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: BPL is good for me,me me me me me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18468776</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/165405"><b>drjim</b></A> : Why do we even bother allowing anon morons to post here when they obviously don't know what they're talking about?<br><SMALL>--<br>One man's Magic is another man's Engineering.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18468776</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:25:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: BPL is good for me,me me me me me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18467097</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : why do we even bother with the nerds with their walkie talkies? upgrade to digital and you wont need your analog toys.  next they'll be pressuring us to go back to aerial tv antennas despite it being able to receive hd content.  cmon!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18467097</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:25:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>BPL is good for me,me me me me me</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18465566</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/934561"><b>Safemaster</b></A> : Go BPL,I hope it spreads like wildfire.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18465566</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:47:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
