Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
1 edit | reply to Dampier
Re: [TWC] TW Officially Announces Packet Shaping for All RR User
there going to have a lot of pissed off people |
|
swintec
Premium
join:2003-12-19
Alfred, ME
 ·RapidVPS
·surpasshosting
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·VoicePulse
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Anonymous_  :there going to have a lot of pissed off people Probably not. Most wont care, or know what it does and the ones that do, well, they would love to get rid of them, as they are probably the ones that are getting the brunt of this. |
|
Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA
| reply to Anonymous_
said by Anonymous_ :there going to have a lot of pissed off people Yah, the people who most abuse network resources.
But it makes TW much more attractive to those who don't wish to compete for bandwidth with all the children stealing moves.
Woot!
Steve
--
Stephen J. Friedl | Unix Wizard | Microsoft Security MVP | Tustin, California USA | my web site |
|
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
 ·Speakeasy
| said by Steve :said by Anonymous_ :there going to have a lot of pissed off people Yah, the people who most abuse network resources. But it makes TW much more attractive to those who don't wish to compete for bandwidth with all the children stealing moves. Woot! Steve Dangit, why is my?
• Download of Windows X SP Y taking for freaking ever to download??
• Download of the latest Linux ISO taking so freaking long to download
• Download of <insert application/OS/update package of your choice here> taking so long to download?
• etc.
--
Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets. |
|
michaelk
join:2003-01-01
Cincinnati, OH
| reply to Steve
I dont use torrent or anything like that, I really prefer the origional/physical product (in packaging), don't ask why? I just use my premium (15/768) for general use, although that does include a lot of speed tests from multiple computers on my network to check effiency. The only problem I can see personally is I have a slingbox (obviously reliant on upload). The ports for it are well above the "standard" range, something crazy like 20 some thousand to help avoid "scans" to my otherwise "stealthed" network. As long as it doesn't affect my usage "profile", I think it's probably a good idea & sounds proactive given some peoples bad speeds during peak hours (which I've never experienced).
I'm rock solid even during peak, so as long as I test @ 15/768 during that time (if implimented here in Cincinnati), I think it's a good idea (even though you P2P users will hate me). |
|
vick04
join:2006-08-06
South Richmond Hill, NY | As bad as packeting shapeing is I much rather have it for peak hours of the day than an bandwidth cap. I am a night person so the packet shaping doesnt really effect me. :P |
|
