<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Portland and Metro-Fi in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18469551</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:47:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:47:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Portland and Metro-Fi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18469551</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Here in Portland it's said that the service works well if you're in the hi-density downtown central urban core <I>and outdoors.</I><br>Inside, even downtown, the signal strength drops rapidly.<br>In the urban residential fringe where I live, the nodes only serve one or two nearby houses, adequately, and a few more can connect with an external booster (user supplied.)<br>I think this is worse than no service at all... because when Wi-Max (or something beter) comes around, the pols won't want to admit their mistake and we'll continue to be stuck with this under-performing system.<br><br><I>[An aside: This whole Metro-Fi operation has all the earmarks of a train wreck coming down the tracks... I'm glad it's not</I> my <I>money on the line.]</I><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18469551</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:47:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
