http://www.dslreports.com/forum/VoIP-service-degration-18470748 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:48:14 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:48:14 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18479974 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18479974 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:57:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18476758 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18476758 Sat, 09 Jun 2007 11:38:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18473011 said by quetwo:

Hrmm... Packet shaping on VoIP.... Hope that includes their own VoIP solution....If TW's VoIP service rides IP outside of their network's border then I agree with you that it should be shaped as well. If their VoIP service hits a switch and is no longer IP before leaving the network's border, then I see your question/statement as irrelevant.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18473011 Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:54:05 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18470884 said by quetwo:

Hrmm... Packet shaping on VoIP.... Hope that includes their own VoIP solution....
Ya sure... Hold your breath. ;)

At least TWC is upfront about it I'll give them that. :)

Sure glad my VZ DSL hasn't implemented all this CableCo nonsense.... Yet.

Cable Speed is a good thing. :D
But what good is it if it's Capped, shaped, throttled, ETC. :huh:
--
If only the Verizon CSRs worked this well. ;)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-VoIP-service-degration-18470884 Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:37:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/VoIP-service-degration-18470748 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/VoIP-service-degration-18470748 Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:02:03 EDT