Enlightener
join:2006-01-28
Cedar Park, TX
 ·AT&T U-Verse
1 edit | reply to Yogibear227
Re: Uverse is FTTN not FTTP
Yogi-
I don't have U-Verse and I don't have FTTN. I have FTTP service. Would you like to see the pictures of the ONT on the side of my to prove it?
Pics in this thread:
»FTTP in D/FW TX??
My point, which you completly lost, was that even though I have FTTP and I should have all of the capacity from now until the forseeable future, it's actually capped at 6MB and runs over the same ATM backbone that DSL does so I only get 5mb.
And that's on a good day, which tonight is not.
 |
|
koolkid1563
Premium,MVM
join:2005-11-06
Powell, WY
clubs:
 ·Bresnan Online
4 edits | Why not post a review for AT&T FTTP?
What I don't understand is why you didn't make a review for AT&T FTTP instead of U-verse...Since technically, you don't have U-verse just yet, or at least that is what I understood.
BTW, I just checked, and they do have AT&T FTTP listed as an ISP to review, and the only person to review it so far is MarkyD. |
|
