Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse » Uverse is FTTN not FTTP
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

koolkid1563
Premium,MVM
join:2005-11-06
Powell, WY
clubs:
·Bresnan Online


4 edits
reply to Yogibear227
Re: Uverse is FTTN not FTTP

said by Yogibear227 :

You will care when you can't Tivo a show cause your watching HDTV and you don't have enough bandwidth cause your kids are gaming. Or when your wife wants to watch one HDTV program and you want to watch another. Or when your children want to game on the net and you want to do your work for the next day; you won't mind if they take your bandwidth & knock you off.
You make a valid point, but some of this need not apply to U-verse. The RG has dedicated throughput set aside for IPTV. Gaming, or surfing the internet will not affect how many TVs can be on, or take up a TV stream. Now, as far as the two HD streams, that is a valid point, and is true with U-verse as it is today. The gaming + work issue? I have had two halo2 games (not in the same game) on Xbox Live running at the same time, and yet, our internet didn't slow down to the point where it was unusable, infact, I didn't notice any slowdown at all (in general web usage). BTW, I was also watching TV on a HD channel, and our TV downstairs was watching a SD channel...all at the same time. It has been reported, that the HD streams are running at ~8Mb/s, with SD streams ~3-4Mb/s. I would learn about how the U-verse system actually works before you put the service down. Sure it is only FTTN, but it works...for now. If AT&T wanted to, their Alcatel FTTN DSLAMs can be switched out for FTTP if the future so requires it, and it most likely will.

said by Yogibear227 :

The reason they can deliver ONLY 6Mbs is because the system of FTTN is limited to 25Mps BANDWIDTH.
Do you even know what you are talking about? Get your facts before making assumptions. The VDSL sync is CAPPED at 27Mb/s, that is NOT its maximum by any means. My RG is reporting a max sync rate of 105Mb/s...and it can only go up when they upgrade to a true VDSL2 profile. Right now, they are on a "hybrid" profile so to speak that is in-between VDSL and VDSL2.

said by Yogibear227 :

the also must deliver more bandwidth to allow you to TIVO in HDTV mode.
Since when does recording a TV show ever take up more bandwidth than actually watching it? That is just not true, a stream is a stream.

said by Yogibear227 :

The Cable company Digital Cable is actual Coax Fiber & Copper and it is thicker than twisted pair phone line.
I didn't see my cable modem report that it could give me 105Mb/s over the cable network...And, if you actually look at the cable that comes into your NID from your pedestal, you will see that the copper core is about the same gauge, maybe slightly smaller, than the copper core of a RG-6 coaxial cable.

said by Yogibear227 :

Your $74 is an introductary rate only for 3 months. What is the rate after 3 months Same as Comcast
Again, learn your facts before posting. The "introductory rate" is free TV for two months, then it goes to whatever your package states, in his case, $74 a month. The only thing you pay for for the first two months is internet. I am on the U-400 + HD + elite internet, and it is only $140 a month plus something like $11 in government fees.One other thing you got wrong, there are no fees for wireless networking...it is all integrated in the RG...I don't know where you got that from. If you read the TOS correctly, it says "Separate purchase of adapter may be required for wireless networking." This is for the wireless ADAPTER for your computer if you don't already have one, not for wireless service on the RG...There is a one-time fee for installation of $50, but they give you a $50 Visa® Rewards Card to compensate for the installation cost, so it is actually free. And don't say wait until you are off the introductory rate...because I currently am off of it. During my "introductory" period of two months, I was only paying $30 a month ($40 minus $10 TV+internet bundle discount).
Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse


Thursday, 03-Dec 01:02:47 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [95] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [49] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [39] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade [Security]
· Tomato/MLPPP v3 alpha 6 released! [TekSavvy]
· LFM Overkill [World of Warcraft]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Poll: Have you ever been charged an overage fee since ... [TekSavvy]
· SB6120 firmware update? [Comcast HSI]