Enlightener
join:2006-01-28
Cedar Park, TX
 ·AT&T U-Verse
1 edit | reply to yogibear227
Re: Uverse is FTTN not FTTP
I say repeatedly in my review that it's FTTP, you just have to actually read. I don't recall an option or see one to try to `move` it to an FTTP section.
I used this page to enter the review:
»/dorateform/fiber
I don't see anything on there about U-Verse and I don't know how it got catagorized as U-Verse. FTTP isn't U-Verse because 1) Video isn't available 2) Voice is required and 3) DL is 5Mb not 6MB because of ATM overhead. |
|
koolkid1563
Premium,MVM
join:2005-11-06
Powell, WY
clubs:
 ·Bresnan Online
3 edits | »/dorateform and run a search for AT&T FTTP. If you run a search for U-verse, it shows up too. Or you can go here: »/docontrib/ISP/2956. I don't know about the "move" part, but AT&T FTTP is there, and since AT&T FTTP and AT&T U-verse are currently two different products, I don't see how your bad review of FTTP should bring down the overall rating of U-verse. I would ask a mod if you can get this moved over to AT&T FTTP. |
|
