Fox McCloud
Ron Paul Enthusiast
join:2006-07-23
 ·Embarq
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Verizon BroadbandA..
| reply to gsmdata
Re: 10 years....
that's nice and all (I read over it briefly), but it's quite useless if the companies don't have the bandwidth to back it up.
From my experience, nearly all cellphone towers have 1 or 2 T1 lines to them; as the technology currently stands, things are pretty much maxed out; one more upgrade (whether it be Revision B, WiMAX, or whatever) and the towers will be stretched to their maximum capacity.
Right now, I think the mobile broadband industry needs to focus on a way which it can get latency on par with that of DSL and cable; once they do that, THEN focus on increasing bandwidth. |
|
hitman_001
Premium
join:2006-11-20
Laredo, TX
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·HughesNet Satellit..
| I think they are doing a fairly good job with latency so far. Your're right, it isnt on par with Cable or DSL yet, but its getting there pretty quickly. 1xrtt provides latency from 300ms and up, the Revision A upgrade brought it down in the 100ms range. Revision B/C and perhaps Wimax will push that down even further, we'll have to wait and see I suppose. But I think the latency is coming down on par with the speed increase. I know the latency REV A provides, I'll be happy to see for some time to come, once it gets here.
--
Hn7000s Small Office plan/.74m dish & 1Watt Trans on Satmex 5 Signal: 86/Win XP Pro SP2/P4 3gig, 2Gigs Ram, Radeon X1300 500meg video |
|
Fox McCloud
Ron Paul Enthusiast
join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Verizon BroadbandA..
| yeah, I know exactly what you mean (I get 100 ms latency when pinging Google and around 140-200 ms latency when on Battlefield 2). With QoS in place, it could be, consistently, as low as 70-80 ms.
I'd say if they can consistently get the latency to 50-60ms, they'll be doing very very well.
Still, my point is, while they come out with new bandwidth technologies, they're really not the great; they'll have to put in massive amounts of money into their towers in order for users to get the increased speeds. |
|
PastTense
join:2007-05-15 | Could someone explain the reasons for the latency differences? |
|
Fox McCloud
Ron Paul Enthusiast
join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Verizon BroadbandA..
| said by PastTense  :Could someone explain the reasons for the latency differences? between what and what, exactly? |
|
forefun
join:2004-04-21
Austin, TX | reply to Fox McCloud
Amen on the Latency!!! |
|
skrupowies
join:2002-08-22
Wallingford, CT
clubs:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to Fox McCloud
Most cell carriers today do, in fact, have only T-1 service. However, AT&T's approach is to provision these T-1's from an on-site fiber mux because the industry forecast is to upgrade cell sites to DS3 / Ethernet / OC-3. So when the carriers are ready for that upgrade AT&T will be as well. |
|
