 | NBC complaint is legit and FCC should consider it The complaint is legitimate and the FCC should seriously consider it while examining submitted comments about creating rules on the network neutrality docket at the FCC.
Any rules concerning network neutrality that the FCC may eventually adopt after examining the comments must not institutionalize the rampant copyright infringement that now takes place on the internet. A huge part of what the US exports is intellectual property and allowing the theft of that property will seriously affect the US economy and balance of trade with other nations. -- -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page |
|
 Reviews:
·Comcast
| said by fAcEtIOUs:The complaint is legitimate and the FCC should seriously consider it while examining submitted comments about creating rules on the network neutrality docket at the FCC. Any rules concerning network neutrality that the FCC may eventually adopt after examining the comments must not institutionalize the rampant copyright infringement that now takes place on the internet. A huge part of what the US exports is intellectual property and allowing the theft of that property will seriously affect the US economy and balance of trade with other nations. Here is a revolutionary thought ! Help the customer get what they want at a price the market will bare and profit. Instead of fight tooth and nail against a new business model and falter.
The us is a major ip exporter , but we also send it to be produced outside our country. Why can't we become a major player in the world of manufactured good like were in the great hay days of this country ? Oh that's right because profits are before pride. And they expect any different from other countries who are "stealing" our ip ? Please.
Give the customers what they want and profit. We are a global market now. Hence stop the regionizing of the content. Put it on the web with some commercials at the beginning , in decent quality. In short take away the advantage of "stealing" the content.
Why the hell is it so hard for people to understand that we stand at the forefront of a world wide market, we use cheap labor from all over the place to get you cheaper items , but yet the companies reaping the profits complain it's not enough.
Gone is the pride this country had in making great products. And so goes our world dominance. It has happened in the past with great civilizations. We are no different , with the huge leaps and bounds computers brought to the world , it advanced the decline of our civilization, unfortunately our kids are to concerned with our "ip" and it is slowly destroying a generation. Much as rap has destroyed 2 generations now.
Such is a scary place to be. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| reply to fAcEtIOUs said by fAcEtIOUs:The complaint is legitimate and the FCC should seriously consider it while examining submitted comments about creating rules on the network neutrality docket at the FCC. Any rules concerning network neutrality that the FCC may eventually adopt after examining the comments must not institutionalize the rampant copyright infringement that now takes place on the internet. A huge part of what the US exports is intellectual property and allowing the theft of that property will seriously affect the US economy and balance of trade with other nations. If the IP industry wants to protect its property, then it needs to come up with either a method to protect its property, or change its business model to fit the 21st century.
The Federal Government should not begin forcing ISP's to become law-enforcement agents - at their own cost - because of another poorly thought out Federal law.
Daddy gubment's job isn't to protect every industry which doesn't want to evolve with the rest of us. -- |- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -| |- Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -| |
|
 | reply to BosstonesOwn said by BosstonesOwn:Here is a revolutionary thought ! Help the customer get what they want at a price the market will bare and profit. Except as is very apparent here in post after post - that price is zero!!! Most of the pirates want everything for free. -- -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page |
|
 gaforcesUnited We Stand, Divided We Fall join:2002-04-07 Santa Cruz, CA | reply to tiger72 But it is changing! Lame reality shows and gambling! Aught to do wonders for long term profit ... -- The will of the people is the best law. -Ulysses S Grant |
|
|
|
 NightfallMy Goal Is To Deny YoursPremium,MVM join:2001-08-03 Grand Rapids, MI Reviews:
·Site5.com
·Comcast
·Callcentric
| reply to fAcEtIOUs said by fAcEtIOUs:said by BosstonesOwn:Here is a revolutionary thought ! Help the customer get what they want at a price the market will bare and profit. Except as is very apparent here in post after post - that price is zero!!! Most of the pirates want everything for free. That, in essence, is a problem. Would lowering the price increase sales? Removing DRM increase sales? Maybe. However, at what point do you just allow people to use your product without paying for it? Another issue is proving it. Sure, your IP is logged, and the ISP can turn over account information. However, short of a court ordered search warrant, there really is nothing that can be done. I haven't seen one search warrant yet on music/movie copyright infringement. -- My Domain Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal |
|
 AlpinePremium join:2000-01-11 Atlanta, GA | reply to BosstonesOwn quote: Here is a revolutionary thought ! Help the customer get what they want at a price the market will bare and profit. Instead of fight tooth and nail against a new business model and falter.
That's great and all, but what does that have to do with pirating others' intellectual property? Are you saying that it's fine to take others' work without paying if you don't care for their business model?
You can wax eloquent about the market and their lack of consumer-oriented policies, and those issues are valid. But you lose 100% credibility if your solution to those issues is simply to take things without compensating the creator.
Adam |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | reply to fAcEtIOUs No way I'm buying P2P is 60%+ of all internet traffic.
No way. |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| reply to fAcEtIOUs While I'll agree that the US exports entertainment, it is not generally the largest export (and thus greatest income).
Why should the government be liable for protecting what an industry should have considered and implemented: protecting its product from theft?
Should P2P be blocked, period? Made illegal like guns and thus a criminal offense to even let a packet escape onto an ISP's network? ...
Media companies are too focused on their parachutes then what the people want. |
|
 KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to fAcEtIOUs well the ISP cant know what im sending. its impossible and hurts performance. and if UPS did deliver drugs or a bomb they arent liable for the laws violated. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
 CabalPremium join:2007-01-21 Austin, TX | reply to tiger72 "You lose 100% credibility if your solution to those issues is simply to take things without compensating the creator." -- Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru? |
|
 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to Alpine Your jumping to a conclusion in saying that I support piracy. I don't , I am a staunch supporter of paying for what you watch. I actually TiVo shows and if the show is good I watch the commercials as well.
The market will pay what it can to get content. If NBC offered their content for 5$ in an economy where people make that a week , what do you expect to happen ? I am not condoning it. But I am calling FUD on the part of NBC. You can not expect people to plunk down a weeks savings to watch tv for an hour. This is not right on their part to expect that of people. The need to do things in scale , but they fear doing that because they feel it cuts down on their profits.
Here in lay the issues for the MPAA and the RIAA , they fail to understand economies of scale and they fail to understand that this thing we call the inter tubes is not under our control. We can't just start interfering with a global system because they feel slighted.
If they would stop doing ridiculous things then maybe they could make more of a profit and prevent runaway salaries like we currently have.
I can't expect a family in Colombia to pay 1.99$ dollar for a show off I tunes. that is some where near 4400 Colombian pesos. and can feed a person lunch there. Now the typical retort will be well then they don't need the show , and should concentrate on the food. Yeah that is all well and good to say that , but because they are third world families doesn't mean they deserve to be un entertained and controlled because they were unfortunate enough to be born into that world. And that is the typical spoiled attitude we as Americans have towards other countries.
With that being said do you think if the show was say 100 Colombian pesos , there would be a chance more people would purchase it in the country instead of grabbing it off their already paid for inter tube thingy ?
We as Americans are spoiled by what we have and don't really look at the world from others points of view. We are falling fast because we have a set of blinders on preventing us from actually seeing the rest of the world.
When NBC decides to play economies of scales they may find themselves in a tight bind. Fox does this and makes a killing in south America , prison break has become a break away hit down there because they played the economy of scales card. Sure its not making them 50 million every episode like the us and Canada markets but it's a strong showing of 2 to 6 million per episode and it hasn't cost them much to play the market.
We will be surpassed by Brazil , China and India in the near future because of greed. And yet people blame piracy for the loss of our ip income. Is it really piracy to blame or is it merely the lack of the ability to throw off the corporate blinders to realize the world is not the US. The only reason we are held in such high regards now is because we have money, and that is it. If we didn't have that and we won't for long , we would be treated like those countries. And when it happens and Brazil's Idol is popular and you have to download it because you can't get it on tv here , maybe you will see how much it affects the people there.
I have said it before and will again. This is a global market now , the companies don't like it because we get options and they can't rake us over the coals any more so their profits dwindle.now we have new corporate overlords to rake us over the coals. Companies like NBC have to realize that our pockets are now emptied globally not just domestically.
While that went a long way it all relates back to the product being sold for a price that a market deems fair enough to purchase. And it varies from person to person. In order to stay competitive you have to cater to the lowest common denominator. So lower the cost or watch your business die. God I love a free market. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to Cabal said by Cabal:"You lose 100% credibility if your solution to those issues is simply to take things without compensating the creator." That is a lame quote. In that it holds no water in a global market. It is a moral issue at best and doesn't help a company who has no morals when it comes to business. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| reply to fAcEtIOUs said by fAcEtIOUs:.. the theft of that property will seriously affect the US economy and balance of trade with other nations. It's not theft, it's copyright infringement.
And I see you have drunk deeply of the RIAA koolaid with your statement about the "economy and trade".
I suppose you also believe infringement is worse than robbing someone on the street or robbing a bank? |
|
 | reply to fAcEtIOUs water is free, but people still pay for it.
Those silly bottled water companies! Instead of lobbying congress for laws to make people drink bottled water, they actually came up with a successful business plan! What a bunch of doofusses! |
|
 | said by nasadude:water is free, but people still pay for it. Those silly bottled water companies! Instead of lobbying congress for laws to make people drink bottled water, they actually came up with a successful business plan! What a bunch of doofusses! Water is free?? Unless you have your own well, water is not free from the tap. It comes either from taxes from municipal water companies or fees paid to private companies. -- -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page |
|
 Ahrenl join:2004-10-26 North Andover, MA | reply to nasadude Water isn't free... unless you live with your parents. Otherwise it's factored into the cost of your rent. (If you're not a property owner) Conversely you could also pay for and maintain a private well, which still costs you money, especially in filtration.
As far as what price is fair, you don't need to set a price that will have EVERYONE buy it. There will always be piraters. The problem right now is that prices have been artificially kept high, and piraters have been able to tap the huge potential of a portion of the populace to help and support them. If you set prices that make it more hassle/risk than reward (Saving a couple of bucks) the pirate community will wither to a select few, who would never have been customers in the first place. Then, who cares what they do, because there's not enough of them to matter. |
|
 MrHappy316Wish I had my tankPremium join:2003-01-02 Summerville, SC Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| For a fact water is free. Like the well example you can also go to the river with a bucket and claim as much free water as you want. Granted it a hassle to bring to your residence, not clean (have to purify it first) and then get rid of it. Most do not want to deal with the hassle or clean it so they pay the local water company.
Likewise, all that free P2P stuff is out there but again its a hassle to download, and then make sure it's clean. If it was reasonably priced instead of a ripoff I would rather buy it than deal with the hassle of waiting who knows how long for it to download and then it crap on my machine. |
|
 N3OGHYo Soy Col. "Bat" GuanoPremium join:2003-11-11 Philly burbs kudos:1 | reply to fAcEtIOUs Water is free in places like restaurants, etc. I've never been charged for a glass of ice water when dining out.
I've also never seen a water fountain with a change slot.
Me, I have a well but even that water isn't free. It costs electricity to pump it to the surface.
I see your point, as far as water not being free, and someone paying for it, etc, etc. But look at the price of a bottle of Fiji water, or even the aquafina stuff Pepsi sells. Right now it's $1.50 for a 20 oz bottle at the local convenience store.
That works out to approximately $9.60 a gallon.
When people are bitching about paying $3.00 a gallon for gas that had to be shipped in from a foreign country, and refined through complex machinery just to make it usable, I consider it some pretty damn good marketing when someone can convince people to pay over 3X more than they are paying for gas when they have a cheap, practically inexhaustible supply of it at home.
I rarely buy bottled water. My well is over 600 ft deep, and the water is great run though the filter built into the fridge... -- O&A back on XM! Found promo code to get free activation and 3 free months. PM me if interested! |
|
 KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to fAcEtIOUs i always drink spring water when at work but then again i use the supplied water coolers. which we are allowed to fill our water bottles from. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|