site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
340
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

2 edits

Wasn't all this info posted yesterday ?

»Re: More media hype
»home.businesswire.com/portal/sit···sLang=en


Raptor
Not a Dumptruck

join:2001-10-21
London, ON

The data may have been presented yesterday in one form or another, but the message was certainly skewed to show the bias....which is really disheartening and typical of late....

Yesterday, we were all a bunch of pirates screwing the poor ISPs who are going broke because we're unfairly using the bandwidth that it's a privilege for us to have. Shame on us for not providing the execs with 9 figure salaries.

Today however, apparently P2P is taking a back seat to HTTP traffic, the kind they so wanted us to use the day before, instead of our mass pirating via P2P.

Funny how the same data can be used to show such different perspectives. Certainly makes me not believe anything they ever say.

And before you go and say again how you can safely assume 99.999 3/4% of HTTP media streaming is pirated, ask your crystal ball whether it's going to rain today for me, I can't tell...the sky looks a bit funny.

Bottom line is they need to change with the times and offer a competitive product.
--
....where's my fiber?



KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

reply to fAcEtIOUs
I remember a post yesterday where someone added together a whole bunch of traffic and then argued that NBCU's bogus charges were accurate.... This thread of course straightens out those erroneous claims....


Monday, 28-May 15:06:56 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics