Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Yeah, Who Wants Accurate Broadband Stats Anyway » Are you serious?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Oh my poor little chirldren.  
AuthorAll Replies

backness

join:2005-07-08
K2P OW2
reply to L337
Re: Are you serious?

I don't really see why this is an issue... the providers in question know which areas are served and which aren't.

That about sums up the whole thing for me.

hmmm.... why would the data holders not want the information to be public?

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by backness See Profile :

...
hmmm.... why would the data holders not want the information to be public?
because it would expose the gaping holes in coverage that exist and would show how little competition there is.

In the major metro area where I live, there is RCN, Verizon, Comcast and who knows how many small providers - at my house, I have one choice for broadband, comcast. It is highly likely, however, that the FCC data for my county probably shows "several" providers available.


TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast


edit:
June 20th, @04:27PM

reply to backness
said by backness See Profile :

I don't really see why this is an issue... the providers in question know which areas are served and which aren't.

And so does anyone who wants to bother to find it. So why should the FCC spend taxpayer dollars to get info that is already available to anyone who wants it?

»www.speedtest.net/global.php
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

So why should the FCC spend taxpayer dollars to get info that is already available to anyone who wants it?
If it's "readily available" (and I don't think it is), then the FCC shouldn't need to spend much, if any money to get it, should they?

The FCC needs that information in order to ensure compliance with the 1996 Telecomm Act. Which is, of course, why Martin is loathe to determine accurate penetration data: if such data showed the broadband wasn't being deployeed in a timely manner, the Telecomm Act would compell the FCC to actually do something about it, and that's something he wants to avoid at all costs. Ideology always triumphs over reality.

All that website shows is what ISP's serve a given city.
Forums » Yeah, Who Wants Accurate Broadband Stats Anyway« Oh my poor little chirldren.  


Sunday, 07-Sep 21:56:09 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [181] Google Browser Available Today
· [124] The Best Bandwidth Meters For Comcast Customers
· [118] Comcast Pays Florida $150K For Misleading Consumers
· [98] Labor Day Open Thread
· [98] Oh Look, Another Ridiculously Huge Wireless Data Bill
· [96] Verizon, AT&T Offer New DSL Promotions
· [67] Google Chrome Runs The Internet Gauntlet
· [65] Routing Around The United States
· [56] iPhone Users Greeted With Morning Outage
· [54] Friday Open Thread
Most people now reading
· [iPhone] Apps not working?? [All things Macintosh]
· Is my landlord trying to screw me? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· What to do when selling and everyone loves it, but no offers [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Bandwidth Monitor for Computers-Suggestions? [Comcast HSI]
· [XP Pro] Tweaking XP to take advantage of second HD [Microsoft help]
· [new forum] Gay / Lesbian Talk [Forum Feature Requests]
· Backdoor Dialing - Free calls to 11% of US Phones [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Engagement Ring Help? [General Questions]
· Election - Oct 14th - Plans? [TekSavvy]