republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Yeah, Who Wants Accurate Broadband Stats Anyway » Are you serious?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Oh my poor little chirldren.  
AuthorAll Replies

backness

join:2005-07-08
K2P OW2
reply to L337
Re: Are you serious?

I don't really see why this is an issue... the providers in question know which areas are served and which aren't.

That about sums up the whole thing for me.

hmmm.... why would the data holders not want the information to be public?

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by backness See Profile :

...
hmmm.... why would the data holders not want the information to be public?
because it would expose the gaping holes in coverage that exist and would show how little competition there is.

In the major metro area where I live, there is RCN, Verizon, Comcast and who knows how many small providers - at my house, I have one choice for broadband, comcast. It is highly likely, however, that the FCC data for my county probably shows "several" providers available.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


1 edit
reply to backness
said by backness See Profile :

I don't really see why this is an issue... the providers in question know which areas are served and which aren't.

And so does anyone who wants to bother to find it. So why should the FCC spend taxpayer dollars to get info that is already available to anyone who wants it?

»www.speedtest.net/global.php
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

So why should the FCC spend taxpayer dollars to get info that is already available to anyone who wants it?
If it's "readily available" (and I don't think it is), then the FCC shouldn't need to spend much, if any money to get it, should they?

The FCC needs that information in order to ensure compliance with the 1996 Telecomm Act. Which is, of course, why Martin is loathe to determine accurate penetration data: if such data showed the broadband wasn't being deployeed in a timely manner, the Telecomm Act would compell the FCC to actually do something about it, and that's something he wants to avoid at all costs. Ideology always triumphs over reality.

All that website shows is what ISP's serve a given city.
Forums » Yeah, Who Wants Accurate Broadband Stats Anyway« Oh my poor little chirldren.  


Monday, 30-Nov 04:50:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [82] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]