site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


ninjatutle
Premium

join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA

reply to bmn

Re: but but it is about the bandwith

What provider is going to give you 1Gbps? And you want that at DSL prices right

ShadezeRO

join:2006-04-24
Fort Lauderdale, FL

I thought I read about a company in California that was doing it.

Started with a 'P'
They offered like 100mb symmetrical also.



KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to ninjatutle

said by ninjatutle:

What provider is going to give you 1Gbps? And you want that at DSL prices right
Er. Remember this is about Video as well as Internet. Those video channels need space too.
That's why cable is superior to phone in this application because you could get 100mbit Internet and still have plenty of bandwidth left over for video channels.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

reply to ninjatutle

said by ninjatutle:

What provider is going to give you 1Gbps? And you want that at DSL prices right
You missed the point entirely, so double for you.

Making the point that coax has more bandwidth that traditional copper pairs... Even pair bonding can't match it.
--
Prove it...


ninjatutle
Premium

join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA

So coaxial cables uses magic copper?


bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

You are the only one who seems to think that some how a single pair of unshielded twisted pair wiring (the wiring that your telephone and DSL comes over) has the same bandwidth capacity as shielded coax. I respectfully submit that you should take yourself over to Google and do some research before you continue to look like an ass.
--
Prove it...



ninjatutle
Premium

join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA

You don't get it do you

Aren't you the one screaming for fibre in other post


bmn
? ? ?
Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus

said by ninjatutle:

You don't get it do you

Aren't you the one screaming for fibre in other post
Yeah, because of the bandwidth limitations of single and even bonded sets of traditional phone pairs.

UVerse = nowhere near the bandwidth or long term viability of DOCSIS because the physical layer is the limiting factor.
--
Prove it...

Monday, 28-May 12:16:14 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics