Re: Last octet 255 bug on Windows?

Author	All Replies
Da Geek Kid join:2003-10-11 Mclean, VA	reply to redhatnation Re: Last octet 255 bug on Windows? said by redhatnation : said by Da Geek Kid : said by redhatnation : Works on a friggin Mac too: $ ping 202.83.176.255 PING 202.83.176.255 (202.83.176.255): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 202.83.176.255: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=294.230 ms 64 bytes from 202.83.176.255: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=289.899 ms ^C --- 202.83.176.255 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 289.899/292.065/294.230/2.166 ms Mac uses BSD TCP/IP and hence it MUST work... if it doesn't than it must be a user error Windows uses portions of the BSD TCP/IP stack too. Your point? maybe the bolded word above would better help you understand the point.
Da Geek Kid join:2003-10-11 Mclean, VA	to forum · permalink · · 2007-06-21 11:25:37 ·
redhatnation Premium join:2005-06-02 Woodbridge, VA ·Comcast	said by Da Geek Kid : maybe the bolded word above would better help you understand the point. I remember you now -- Mr. Layer 2 router... BTW, nice try. The TCP/IP stack used by MS was rewritten and contains zero code directly from the BSD stack. I just wanted to see if you'd bite...again. Some of the TCP/IP utilities in MS contains BSD code -- and even the copyrights -- but the stack was completely rewritten. »www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystor···641/7357 »archives.neohapsis.com/archives/···827.html Come back when you aren't so wet behind the ears. lol
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-06-21 19:13:59 ·
InGreenwood @rr.com	Is there a way to ban redhatnation, or do we only get to ignore him? We have enough misinformation here with out spreading it deliberately.
InGreenwood @rr.com	to forum · permalink · 2007-06-22 08:22:26 ·


Tuesday, 01-Dec 10:00:25	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF