<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Throttling = Less Traffic in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18549198</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:16:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:16:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Throttling = Less Traffic</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18551398</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/326902"><b>james</b></A> : Yes, that is the whole point of this thread...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18551398</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:16:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Throttling = Less Traffic</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18549198</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/753313"><b>Fishie</b></A> : If an ISP is throttling P2P traffic, wouldn't that mean less P2P traffic? Hence, HTTP traffic would rise above (if it were actually below). Besides, since companies hate P2P, I always question their method of measurement when analyzing and reporting P2P traffic.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18549198</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:24:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
