Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Qwest Angry At Colorado Towns » this "demand to know" issue should spread
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
472
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« What's really funny...  
AuthorAll Replies


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:

1 edit
this "demand to know" issue should spread

this would put quite the snag in telco video roll-out plans. seems only fair though. if telco isn't coming to town anytime soon, cities can start muni systems.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by morbo See Profile :

this would put quite the snag in telco video roll-out plans. seems only fair though. if telco isn't coming to town anytime soon, cities can start muni systems.
And quite the snag in providing competition to cable providers. They are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

it wouldnt snag competition at all, if cable for exmaple saw qwest was really strong in one area and they had it neglected oddds are they would start to apply pressure to that area to take customers away from Qwest.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:

2 edits
reply to TKJunkMail
uh, no. if telco isn't coming to town and they have to disclose that information, then how is starting a muni system cutting off their nose? telco isn't coming! muni is a competition to cableco. competition is good, right?


jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

And quite the snag in providing competition to cable providers. They are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
Well, the telcos moaned and hollered for these changes, and now they have to live with the FCC order's ambiguities. This one-size-fits-all-not-really approach is one of the reasons the FCC (until now) has kept out of the local franchise arena.

I would think you of all people would hate unelected bureaucrats in D.C. telling folks how to run things in Hometown, USA. As the Wikipedia entry for the 10th Amendment says:
"The Amendment, which makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers it is granted in the Constitution, is generally recognized to be a truism."
--
If they told you wolverines would make good house pets, would you believe them?

-"Planes, Trains & Automobiles"

RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

reply to morbo
said by morbo See Profile :

uh, no. if telco isn't coming to town and they have to disclose that information, then how is starting a muni system cutting off their nose? telco isn't coming! muni is a competition to cableco. competition is good, right?
Except some people tend to think that once the government has given up something (like internet, telephone, etc), then they should not ever be allowed back in, no matter what the level or what the reason or what the majority of the tax payers (well, we all know that the 'majority' is 51% of the 10% who bother to vote) want. And they pay good money to 'law makers' to ensure that muni's can not carry out the will of the local people.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.

PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

They are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
Not as far as they're concerned. They're simply choosing to discourage telcos from coming in, cherry-picking, and offering service to only a portion of their citizens. The towns decided that such a development would be worse than no telco TV at all. IMHO it's a reasonable position. As representatives of all their citizens, they have an obligation to look out for all of them, when granting certain permissions to private firms to utility the right-of-way and other public resources.

PeterCollins

join:2005-05-23
Geneva, IL
reply to TKJunkMail
Or they could just enter the market on a level playing field to the cable cos and be required to do a full buildout (like the cable cos must do).


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
reply to morbo
Its not about cable at all. its that they want to be able to cherrypick which areas they'll deploy in.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth
Forums » Qwest Angry At Colorado Towns« What's really funny...  


Friday, 27-Nov 23:43:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [61] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [39] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· 5 hour energy for diabetic [General Questions]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· [Vista] Why is HD So Full? [Microsoft Help]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· MagicJack Error Broken Storage [MagicJack]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]