site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
kudos:1

reply to hottboiinnc

Re: Cry Cry Cry

said by hottboiinnc:

Actually no I don't have anything to do with AT&T I don't even use their services. I use Time Warner and Sprint. And someone from Lowe's Companies, Inc signs my paycheck since you asked

But what Ed had to say back when he said this does not have anything to do with now. It did not happen. Nobody is charging content providers anything extra to access the end-user and Ed is not even working for AT&T any longer so whats the big deal?

And again why create a law when one is not needed? When this changes, if it ever does, then we may need a bill/law protecting the customers.
Did not happen. Wonder what would have happened if the fuss did not occur? And from what I have read in various trade journals, I doubt if the thought of more money into the coffers will go away unless something is done. History has proven that corporations, especially big ones that many people depend on, do not care about anything except the executive bonus levels.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.

Monday, 28-May 15:15:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics