| reply to FiL
Re: Muni-WiFi failure list grows by 1 Did you not RTFA?
The linked previous stories about why previous vendor pulled out, indicated the Sacramento politicians originally said they were going to be an "anchor tenant". Essentially using this WISP as their provider and paying a bunch for it, would give them a big fixed customer.
Then they changed their minds and suddenly wanted it to be all ad-supported, with the city risking nothing. Sounds good to the taxpayers, but blew the deal. City wanted to have no skin in the game, but dictate all the terms for "their" network. Typical. |
