Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Radio Silence » Only have seen two stations...
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
What's the big deal, really? »
« This Just In  
disc

join:2005-12-31
Raleigh, NC

Re: Irony

said by Time4aNAP See Profile :

As a licensed terrestrial radio broadcaster, WFMU is exempt from the back-breaking royalty rates. It's nice to have their support, but ironic since they have nothing to lose.
Good point. I followed one of their links and they had this to say:

WFMU believes in compensating artists. We currently pay webcasting royalties to SoundExchange and will continue to do so, but we are protesting the new rate scheme for a number of reasons:

1. Under the new rates, non-commercial webcasters only get a break on the commercial royalty rate if they maintain small listenership numbers. In order to afford the astronomical new rates, WFMU may have to cap online listenership on our streams, limiting our accessibility to music fans.

2. SoundExchange has not been dutifully distributing webcasting royalties to artists, claiming on their website that they are unable to locate thousands of artists including Kraftwerk, The Replacements, Pizzicato Five, The Muffs, and even Warren G!


The second point is noble, but the first one certainly hits their bottom line. I would think it would hit all college stations that webcast too.
Time4aNAP
Premium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL

Re: Irony

said by disc See Profile :

The second point is noble, but the first one certainly hits their bottom line. I would think it would hit all college stations that webcast too.
Not really. The station's rate card is based on OTA listeners, not the Internet listenership. Some advertisers might pay a token fee for the extra exposure from webcasts, but nothing compared to what they pay for the Nielsen and/or Arbitron rated coverage.

Up until now, streaming has been an inexpensive way to promote your station. If and when it stops being inexpensive, terrestrial broadcasters will simply stop streaming. That means that you'll no longer be able to listen to your favorite hometown radio station when you're on vacation, but it's no real loss for the station itself.
Forums » Radio SilenceWhat's the big deal, really? »
« This Just In  


Friday, 27-Nov 16:06:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [49] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Question for DSL Co CEO's - Competition Bureau do u use it? [Canadian Broadband]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· Bell offering 175M service :) [TekSavvy]