kliles
join:2007-06-26
Mississauga, ON
| reply to pashcroft0
Re: Sweet Revenge - Throttling
I can appreciate your frustration with your home internet service, but I would have thought a business-related decision should have been made for business-related reasons.
How will you explain to your boss why you didn't save even more money for the company by listening to the counter offer from the Rogers account rep? |
|
Willerd
@rogers.com
| Good for you, Pashcroft! 
Hopefully, with enough people complaining, we'll all get through to Rogers that throttling of our bandwith usage is unfair.
We already have a cap in place. To have something to throttle or shape what we do with our bandith usage,
just isn't right.  |
|
sbrook
Premium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
H0H 0H0 | As mentioned many times, the cap and the throttling exist for two decidedly different purposes even if it looks like they might be. |
|
puzz1ed
join:2005-02-20
Markham, ON | reply to kliles
Lowest price is not the only criteria. It's perfectly reasonable to pay more to deal with a company you feel more comfortable with or trust more. |
|
sbrook
Premium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
H0H 0H0 | I think the general experience is that Rogers is NOT such a company. |
|
koolin
join:2005-12-20
Toronto, ON
| nice work. I just did something simular where we were looking for cells for the company I work for and it was between Rogers and Telus, Telus won. But not just cause of throttling, but I made sure the Rogers rep knew that throttling was one of the issues. |
|
lawrence171
Evilly Yours - Evilness
join:2001-12-24
Canada
| reply to puzz1ed
said by puzz1ed  :Lowest price is not the only criteria. It's perfectly reasonable to pay more to deal with a company you feel more comfortable with or trust more. Bell vs. Rogers? Neither can be trusted that much with, but my experiences with Rogers have been better.
Bell Mobility's network sucks.
--
What I used to be I no longer am... God, why can't you freeze time for my sake? |
|
