<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>&#x22;Lower taxes, less government, more freedom&#x22; my @$$ in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18602346</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:26:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:26:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Hundt&#x27;s isn&#x27;t answering the questions raised by study</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18602975</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/617389"><b>Zoder</b></A> : First page of the study.<br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>BY JEFFREY A. EISENACH, PH.D. &#134;<br><br>&#134;Chairman, Criterion Economics and Adjunct Professor, George Mason University Law School. The<br>author expresses thanks to Joseph Kraemer for helpful suggestions, but takes full responsibility for any errors or omissions. <B>Support for this paper was provided by Verizon Communications. </B>The opinions expressed are my own.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18602975</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:35:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>&#x22;Lower taxes, less government, more freedom&#x22; my @$$</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18602346</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1451792"><b>Time4aNAP</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>No matter who paid for the study, it has made many valid points...</DIV>No, it hasn't.  In fact its few <I>claims</I> are false and/or misleading.<br><br><div class="bquote">...that Frontline has refused to answer.</DIV>Those questions are nobody's business but Frontline's.  What grounds do <I>you</I> have to claim that "Hundt's [sic] isn't answering the questions raised by (the) study"?  And why do you feel that Frontline has any obligation to Verizon's hired guns?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18602346</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:38:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hundt&#x27;s isn&#x27;t answering the questions raised by study</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18601683</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/765230"><b>Neyland</b></A> : How do we know this was paid for by Verizon?  Just because a link on this website indicating that it was doesn't make it so...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18601683</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:43:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hundt&#x27;s isn&#x27;t answering the questions raised by study</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18600609</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.freedomworks.org/informed/issues_template.php?issue_id=2859&isitsearch=1&search1=frontline" >www.freedomworks.org/informed/is&middot;&middot;&middot;rontline</A><br><br>No matter who paid for the study, it has made many valid points that Frontline has refused to answer. And Reed Hundt(a Frontline employee) has done nothing to answer those questions. All he has done is trot out the worn out argument that his opponent(a major telco) is against it - so therefore it must be a good plan.<br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18600609</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:04:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
