Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Network Burp » Design Issues on AT&T's side probably.
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
202
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Oh hi, I'm from the Internet. »
« That's what happened....  
AuthorAll Replies

Devistater

join:2004-02-13
Clovis, CA
reply to djrobx
Re: Design Issues on AT&T's side probably.

That only happened once???


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to NOCMan
quote:
In a ISP design as large as theirs it should be broken up into smaller areas so you do not lose the entire network.
You mean kind of like when Comcast went down nationwide a couple years back because someone had the bright idea to centralize the DNS servers?
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.

CMoore2004
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Jonesville, MI

reply to NOCMan
Would they have gotten as much money, though? I'm willing to bet AT&T paid plenty to be the exclusive carrier. This isn't about being innovative. It's about money, as it always is.
--
Sprint Mobile Broadband PX-500 | Windows XP MCE SP2 | Mobile AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | 1.5GB RAM | ATI Mobile Radeon X600 128MB | 120GB HDD


NOCMan
Verizon Fios User
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Flower Mound, TX

My guess is AT&T has some stupid design for their AAA complex. In a ISP design as large as theirs it should be broken up into smaller areas so you do not lose the entire network. To have the entire network go down in this fashion for one device sounds like user error on the AAA database that killed off authentication for a specific device. The only problem I have with that is I've never heard of AAA being used to ban devices.

*shrug* sabotage

Course AT&T and company are known for network wide outages for various reasons.

Apple prides itself with being the best, but they locked their shiny new device down on possibly the worst cellular company in America.

I can agree with the price of the device. What I can not agree with is carrier locking. Apple could have sold in all their channel partners and would have received near or better product sales coverage than just sticking with AT&T. They could have negotiated features with the cellular companies as well. Let them handle customer service for cellular related features and have them handoff for anything else.

Never made sense how they rushed into this product and never stood back and checked their alternatives.
--
Mac Chatter
»www.macchatter.net
Forums » AT&T Network BurpOh hi, I'm from the Internet. »
« That's what happened....  


Tuesday, 08-Dec 22:44:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [193] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [48] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [18] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Servers UP!!! [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [Signals] 750ft, can it be done? [Comcast HSI]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin(s) for December 8, 2009 [Security]
· 5 weeks and still no internet [TekSavvy]
· Account Hacked With Authenticator [World of Warcraft]