Design Issues on AT&T's side probably. in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18606330 en Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:40:48 EDT Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:40:48 EDT Re: Design Issues on AT&T's side probably. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18608237 Devistater : That only happened once???
:)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18608237 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:57:35 EDT Re: Design Issues on AT&T's side probably. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18607014 djrobx :
quote:
In a ISP design as large as theirs it should be broken up into smaller areas so you do not lose the entire network.
You mean kind of like when Comcast went down nationwide a couple years back because someone had the bright idea to centralize the DNS servers? :)
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18607014 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:10:07 EDT Re: Design Issues on AT&T's side probably. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18606884 CMoore2004 : Would they have gotten as much money, though? I'm willing to bet AT&T paid plenty to be the exclusive carrier. This isn't about being innovative. It's about money, as it always is.
--
Sprint Mobile Broadband PX-500 | Windows XP MCE SP2 | Mobile AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | 1.5GB RAM | ATI Mobile Radeon X600 128MB | 120GB HDD]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18606884 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:42:30 EDT Design Issues on AT&T's side probably. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18606330 NOCMan : My guess is AT&T has some stupid design for their AAA complex. In a ISP design as large as theirs it should be broken up into smaller areas so you do not lose the entire network. To have the entire network go down in this fashion for one device sounds like user error on the AAA database that killed off authentication for a specific device. The only problem I have with that is I've never heard of AAA being used to ban devices.

*shrug* sabotage

Course AT&T and company are known for network wide outages for various reasons.

Apple prides itself with being the best, but they locked their shiny new device down on possibly the worst cellular company in America.

I can agree with the price of the device. What I can not agree with is carrier locking. Apple could have sold in all their channel partners and would have received near or better product sales coverage than just sticking with AT&T. They could have negotiated features with the cellular companies as well. Let them handle customer service for cellular related features and have them handoff for anything else.

Never made sense how they rushed into this product and never stood back and checked their alternatives.
--
Mac Chatter
»www.macchatter.net]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18606330 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:53:39 EDT