site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Members Help Page ·Site FAQ ·Site bugs FAQ
AuthorAll Replies


justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7

reply to nwrickert

Re: New SSL Cert Problem Report

weird. I'll look at it again sometime soon. I'm out of ideas.


nwrickert
sand groper
Premium,MVM
join:2004-09-04
Geneva, IL
kudos:7
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

1 edit

Using openssl on linux, I tried the command:


openssl s_client -CAfile gd-class2-root.crt -connect secure.dslreports.com:443

Here is the beginning of the output:
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=0 /O=secure.dslreports.com/OU=Domain Control Validated/CN=secure.dslreports.com
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 /O=secure.dslreports.com/OU=Domain Control Validated/CN=secure.dslreports.com
verify error:num=27:certificate not trusted
verify return:1
depth=0 /O=secure.dslreports.com/OU=Domain Control Validated/CN=secure.dslreports.com
verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate
verify return:1
---
Certificate chain
 0 s:/O=secure.dslreports.com/OU=Domain Control Validated/CN=secure.dslreports.com
   i:/C=US/ST=Arizona/L=Scottsdale/O=GoDaddy.com, Inc./OU=http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/CN=Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority/serialNumber=07969287
---
 
I then tried:

openssl s_client -CAfile gd-class2-root.crt -connect certificates.godaddy.com:443

and the corresponding part of the output is:
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=3 /L=ValiCert Validation Network/O=ValiCert, Inc./OU=ValiCert Class 2 Policy Validation Authority/CN=http://www.valicert.com//emailAddress=info@valicert.com
verify error:num=19:self signed certificate in certificate chain
verify return:0
---
Certificate chain
 0 s:/C=US/ST=Arizona/L=Scottsdale/O=GoDaddy.com, Inc./CN=certificates.godaddy.com/1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.2=AZ/1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.3=US/serialNumber=0796928-7
   i:/C=US/ST=Arizona/L=Scottsdale/O=GoDaddy.com, Inc./OU=http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/CN=Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority/serialNumber=07969287
 1 s:/C=US/ST=Arizona/L=Scottsdale/O=GoDaddy.com, Inc./OU=http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository/CN=Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority/serialNumber=07969287
   i:/C=US/O=The Go Daddy Group, Inc./OU=Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority
 2 s:/C=US/O=The Go Daddy Group, Inc./OU=Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority
   i:/L=ValiCert Validation Network/O=ValiCert, Inc./OU=ValiCert Class 2 Policy Validation Authority/CN=http://www.valicert.com//emailAddress=info@valicert.com
 3 s:/L=ValiCert Validation Network/O=ValiCert, Inc./OU=ValiCert Class 2 Policy Validation Authority/CN=http://www.valicert.com//emailAddress=info@valicert.com
   i:/L=ValiCert Validation Network/O=ValiCert, Inc./OU=ValiCert Class 2 Policy Validation Authority/CN=http://www.valicert.com//emailAddress=info@valicert.com
---
 
As you can see, the Go Daddy site is presenting a longer certificate chain.

(added in edit) The file "gd-class2-root.crt" referenced in the openssl commands above, contains the GoDaddy Class 2 CA certificate as downloaded from GoDaddy, and should be the same as the certificate in the firefox store.
--
AT&T dsl; Westell 2200 modem/router; SuSE 10.1; firefox 2.0.0.4


nwrickert
sand groper
Premium,MVM
join:2004-09-04
Geneva, IL
kudos:7

reply to justin
It seems to be working fine this morning.



justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7

yeah i found the problem the apache server needed the certificate chain installed on it, which I had to twice before I got it right!



NoVA_CoxUser
Stand back from the cage -- The RF bites
Premium
join:2004-07-06
Alexandria, VA

Nice work, thanks.



justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7
Host:
IPv6
Business Connectiv..
Console/Handheld g..
Console Tech
Home/Office setup ..

Nice work would have been getting it right the first time.

By the way, when your ssl cert comes up for renewal, shop around. Its down to 17 bucks per year.. Rapidssl was spamming me rigid hoping I would renew with them for 49! Last year they were the cheapest..



steve1515
Premium
join:2000-08-07
Peabody, MA

I get a Forbidden message when I go to »/

Is this still a work in progress? I don't see any link to it on the main page.



justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7

no, it isn't a work in progress, it is the url for secure login posting after you click to the 'secure' version of the login page. there are no pages to get from it.



steve1515
Premium
join:2000-08-07
Peabody, MA

said by justin:

no, it isn't a work in progress, it is the url for secure login posting after you click to the 'secure' version of the login page. there are no pages to get from it.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't know how to "click to" the secure version of the login page. I don't see any links to a secure login page.


nwrickert
sand groper
Premium,MVM
join:2004-09-04
Geneva, IL
kudos:7
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

If you click on "login" (without entering any login data), you get a page where there is a link for secure login.

When testing the CERT problem, I did just browse to "https://secure.dslreports.com", and ignored the "403 Forbidden" message.
--
AT&T dsl; Westell 2200 modem/router; SuSE 10.1; firefox 2.0.0.4



steve1515
Premium
join:2000-08-07
Peabody, MA

Ah...that works, but it seems like it's a complicated way of doing things.



NoVA_CoxUser
Stand back from the cage -- The RF bites
Premium
join:2004-07-06
Alexandria, VA

1 edit

said by steve1515:

Ah...that works, but it seems like it's a complicated way of doing things.
I don't understand how to "ignore" the 403 Forbidden page ...

... anyway ... I always use this URL »/login/?secure=1 for my DSLR logins.

Even though the page itself isn't SSL-secured, the username/password are transmitted using SSL.


steve1515
Premium
join:2000-08-07
Peabody, MA

said by NoVA_CoxUser:

I don't understand how to "ignore" the 403 Forbidden page ...
Here's how I had to do it...
On the main page, clear out my username from the user name box, then click the login button, it will take me to another login page that contains a link to login securely.
From there I can log in with SSL.

Now, I find this to be a lot of steps just to use SSL.
Also, like you say...the log in page isn't SSL-secured, but it should be.


NoVA_CoxUser
Stand back from the cage -- The RF bites
Premium
join:2004-07-06
Alexandria, VA

said by steve1515:

... like you say...the log in page isn't SSL-secured, but it should be ...
Agree.

That's the only way for a user to ensure that the site is "legit" prior to sending the form data (i.e. username / password).


justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7

Having a silently accepted SSL certificate is no guarantee of anything. Any phish site can be https.



nwrickert
sand groper
Premium,MVM
join:2004-09-04
Geneva, IL
kudos:7
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to NoVA_CoxUser

I don't understand how to "ignore" the 403 Forbidden page ...
The certificate checks are done before you get that message. Thus if I was only testing whether there were certificate problems, I could use that url and pay no attention to the 403 error. That doesn't log me in, but it does test for certificate problems.
--
AT&T dsl; Westell 2200 modem/router; SuSE 10.1; firefox 2.0.0.4


NoVA_CoxUser
Stand back from the cage -- The RF bites
Premium
join:2004-07-06
Alexandria, VA

4 edits

reply to justin

said by justin:

Having a silently accepted SSL certificate is no guarantee of anything. Any phish site can be https.
Not sure what you mean by "silently accepted" ... but I assume that you mean when "joe average internet user" sees "the little lock" and automatically assumes that all's ok. (or worse ... blindly clicks "proceed" when alerted to a certificate/domain mismatch! )

And you're 100% right about phishers using SSL. As you said, SSL certs can be obtained for $17!

But by providing a hierarchically-trusted SSL sign-in page, at least the more sophisticated users (e.g. the majority of DSLR users) could be provided an extra level of assurance that the signin page itself was legit and that it hadn't been somehow spoofed or redirected (e.g. by DNS poisoning, unauthorized host file modification, etc.).

Or am I missing something here ???

Monday, 28-May 12:33:16 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics