
how-to block ads
|
 S_engineer
join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL | Re: Solved If you own a home, then you might understand. The fake deer has some appeal though, people might come by and shoot at it then! | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: Solved I agree... those stop light controller boxes are at EVERY intersection here in Santa Clarita, and by comparison, make VRAD look insignificant in size and the amount of them.
I programmed a PIC microcontroller in college to run a stoplight controller (RISC assembler) , and it was no larger than the size of a piece of toast. | |
|  |  |  |  cajundsl cajundsl Denver Qwest
join:2003-02-05 Denver, CO
| Re: Solved I remember back during the heyday of the Altair 8080 reading that one of the original applications of the Intel 8008 chip that ran it was... to control traffic signals. And you guys are, of course, right - the world is full of things like the BASIC Stamp that have on-chip RAM and ROM and can be burned with all the software required to operate a traffic light.
All I can figure is that the things we see on street corners are over-engineered so that when one fritzes out and causes two city buses to collide head-on (or something equally bad) that during the trial, the highway department can point to the puke-green vault looking thing and say "But we took every precaution, spared no expense to assure the public safety." | |
|  |  |   phattieg
join:2001-04-29 Winter Park, FL
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| said by djrobx :Yeah, here in Valencia there are utility cabinets galore around town. The U-verse cabinets are dwarfed by the massive cabinets used to run traffic stoplights. They kind of blend in. At least with U-verse, I understand that they need to cram a lot of DSLAMs into a small space. Why such a massive cabinet is required to control the on/off states of a few lamps is beyond me. -- Rob Well, ancient equipment, like traffic lights, need all that space. Think back to the days when computers took 2 or 3 story buildings to work... If we lived in the now, and the government would contribute enough to expand our highway systems, then they would be much smaller. I would have anticipated by now the lil box would hang from the wire that had the stop lights on it, because technically, they COULD do that. But I guess when you are a company who makes a living off of citywide contracts, you tend to keep your technology cheap, or else you go with what actually works... -- SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1. | |
|  |  |  |  bogey780
join:2004-03-19 Here
| Re: Solved Uhhh..it has nothing to do with age.
In order to keep flow optimized there's various sensors running back and forth giving information to a computer that figures out who is waiting for clearance. It then figures that into the time of day and sets the rotation for the whole intersection. It could be made smaller and more demure but there's no bother since intersections are seldom pretty. | |
|  |  |  |  |   phattieg
join:2001-04-29 Winter Park, FL
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Solved said by bogey780 :Uhhh..it has nothing to do with age. In order to keep flow optimized there's various sensors running back and forth giving information to a computer that figures out who is waiting for clearance. It then figures that into the time of day and sets the rotation for the whole intersection. It could be made smaller and more demure but there's no bother since intersections are seldom pretty. Uhh, that comment was not well thought out. Considering the iPhone can detect if it's horizontal or vertical, or the smartphones running windows are as thin as a Moto Razr while closed.
The point is, the equipment is bulky because nobody has bothered to try and "downsize" it. They have kept the same, proprietary devices since automated traffic lights were invented. The wires from the sensors aren't the size as a cabinet. Could you please tell me a justifiable reason they are so huge? Realistically, there is no reason for them to be so large. I could see if they were HALF the size they are now, and that consideration is being made with the assumption that there is battery backups in them. They make devices now that handle phone, internet, and TV, and are as big as a classic VCR. They take input and deliver output back to the headend, which constitutes similar functionality as a traffic light controller. If they embed all the devices in one of those cabinets into a single controller that does it all, they can go from 5 ft tall, down to a few inches tall. For crying out loud, we are fitting 4 cpu cores on a chip that is smaller than a standard playing card. Please tell me the need for them to continiue using controllers from the 1980's. It's not like they have a network of 100 phone line PAIRS coming into the cabinet on a traffic light, so I can see why a VDSL cabinet is so large.
Again, I realize the traffic light controllers take input from pressure sensors, and also calculate the time of day, and the load of traffic, but it does not excuse their size. It would be like us still using a UNIVAC computer, which takes up the space of a three story building, just to run the internet. It isn't happening, so why should traffic lights be any different. At least if they were smaller, they could be buried underground, away from the potential of being smacked into by a drunk driver.
So, it has EVERYTHING to do with age, because each year, new technology gets smaller and smaller. Hell, even the iPod is 1/4 the size it use to be, and is capable of doing way more than a traffic light controller. And what you are talking about, as far as "optimized sensors" and time of day, etc, I have configured very similar stuff on my VoIP box. That could all be reduced to a single chip...
A simple solution to your argument would be to post a link to "how it works" so we can see the point of this huge ass box that makes traffic lights work. The cable company has a node that turns fiber optic into coax, and is responsible for 100+ VoIP customers, 300+ modems, and only god knows how many TV customers, and it is the size of a car amplifier, so please, enlighten me.
This message may come across as "offensive" so forgive me, but you need to explain some of this logic, as I fail to imagine any other reason as to why you said it was acceptable. Sorry.  -- SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   PhoenixAZ Joshua Premium join:2004-01-04 Phoenix, AZ
| Re: Solved said by phattieg :said by bogey780 :Uhhh..it has nothing to do with age. In order to keep flow optimized there's various sensors running back and forth giving information to a computer that figures out who is waiting for clearance. It then figures that into the time of day and sets the rotation for the whole intersection. It could be made smaller and more demure but there's no bother since intersections are seldom pretty. Uhh, that comment was not well thought out. Considering the iPhone can detect if it's horizontal or vertical, or the smartphones running windows are as thin as a Moto Razr while closed. The point is, the equipment is bulky because nobody has bothered to try and "downsize" it. They have kept the same, proprietary devices since automated traffic lights were invented. The wires from the sensors aren't the size as a cabinet. Could you please tell me a justifiable reason they are so huge? Realistically, there is no reason for them to be so large. I could see if they were HALF the size they are now, and that consideration is being made with the assumption that there is battery backups in them. They make devices now that handle phone, internet, and TV, and are as big as a classic VCR. They take input and deliver output back to the headend, which constitutes similar functionality as a traffic light controller. If they embed all the devices in one of those cabinets into a single controller that does it all, they can go from 5 ft tall, down to a few inches tall. For crying out loud, we are fitting 4 cpu cores on a chip that is smaller than a standard playing card. Please tell me the need for them to continiue using controllers from the 1980's. It's not like they have a network of 100 phone line PAIRS coming into the cabinet on a traffic light, so I can see why a VDSL cabinet is so large. Again, I realize the traffic light controllers take input from pressure sensors, and also calculate the time of day, and the load of traffic, but it does not excuse their size. It would be like us still using a UNIVAC computer, which takes up the space of a three story building, just to run the internet. It isn't happening, so why should traffic lights be any different. At least if they were smaller, they could be buried underground, away from the potential of being smacked into by a drunk driver. So, it has EVERYTHING to do with age, because each year, new technology gets smaller and smaller. Hell, even the iPod is 1/4 the size it use to be, and is capable of doing way more than a traffic light controller. And what you are talking about, as far as "optimized sensors" and time of day, etc, I have configured very similar stuff on my VoIP box. That could all be reduced to a single chip... A simple solution to your argument would be to post a link to "how it works" so we can see the point of this huge ass box that makes traffic lights work. The cable company has a node that turns fiber optic into coax, and is responsible for 100+ VoIP customers, 300+ modems, and only god knows how many TV customers, and it is the size of a car amplifier, so please, enlighten me. This message may come across as "offensive" so forgive me, but you need to explain some of this logic, as I fail to imagine any other reason as to why you said it was acceptable. Sorry. What if your little traffic card fails, have fun spending lots of money to replace it. The point of this equipment is modularity, if a piece of equipment fails, they can just take the old stuff out, and put the new stuff in, kind of like rackmount servers.
Also, why aren't servers pintsized as well? Why isn't your computer the size of a card? It's because traffic equipment needs this much room as well. And I can bet you the servers run nothing but your average installation of Windows (server versions sometimes) -- Joshua| About Me | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  bogey780
join:2004-03-19 Here
| Re: Solved Exactly.
These things aren't switching small loads either. Could they make it smaller? I don't know. I'm not a traffic engineer. But I tend to think a microprocessor would blow up if it had to deal with the wattage that an intersection runs on. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   fabero74
join:2003-03-28 Groton, CT | Re: Solved Wouldn't the traffic boxes size also be attributable to the need to have a large cooling system, especially in warmer states? | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  raster44
join:2003-09-07 North Tonawanda, NY
| During our power outage last Fall (freak October snowstorm in buffalo), signal department had small gasoline powered generators (1500 Watt) running traffic signals at major intersections throughout the city. These are like ten three-bulb signals at each intersection of six lane highways. I doubt if much power is involved. The man-power involved was unbelievable though. Three police cars and a three man signal crew which went up and down the highways keeping the signals gasoline generators running. And this for 24 hours and the three days until power restored. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   phattieg
join:2001-04-29 Winter Park, FL
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Solved said by en102 :Again... these can be built on fairly simple / small devices - even with timers, sensors (including left turn, pedestrian, time of day) can be built onto a single chip. Add in commercial grade, and you're typically talking a single card. Some newer ones (here in Los Angeles county anyways) are also tied into a 'grid' system. LADPW have a system (not sure the extent covered), where there's a system control center which can change the light schedules based on traffic flow (i.e. for diverting traffic during accidents). Even with all that... they're still huge, especially in comparison to a VRAD. And thats my whole point, they CAN, but AREN'T, because nobody gives a crap. And the problem is, these "non-techno geek" type people don't mind spending thousands of dollars of tax payers money to replace the old dinosaur equipment with a newer dinosaur box... It's all a money game... And around Jacksonville, they still have ones that end up losing their programming after a power outage, and default to flashing red and yellow traffic lights. If they would just "advance" then we'd have better traffic management. I HAVE seen the ones that the DOT (Dept. of Transportation) can remote control, but they can only control a select few. I have even seen some interfaced with cameras to catch red light runners. With all this old junk in place, you'd think they'd opt for cheaper, more reliable equipment, which is smaller. It's a joke, and a rip-off...  -- SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |   John Galt Forward, March Premium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp
·CenturyLink
| Re: Solved said by phattieg :It's a joke, and a rip-off... It is always fascinating to see someone who has no idea of what they are talking about get so passionate about it. -- A is A | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  bogey780
join:2004-03-19 Here | Re: Solved It goes with the site. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  DSL Oberst
join:2001-11-29 | Oldtech is often cheaper than newtech. That uber-small card you reference is handy, sure...but is bound to cost 10x more than the old dinosaur. Cheaper. Better. Faster. Pick two. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   sivran Long Live The Suite Premium join:2003-09-15 Arlington, TX clubs: | Re: Solved Tell that to the old 168-pin RAM in my older machines.  Often, but not always. | |
|  |  |   PhoenixAZ Joshua Premium join:2004-01-04 Phoenix, AZ
2 edits | You do know traffic lights are now sophisticated pieces of technology as well right? They are no longer just timers and on off switches.
In road or above ground (ever notice those little cameras on top of traffic lights?) sensors detect traffic, can change signals based on traffic, pedestrians, and bikers, can divert traffic if there is a collision, and more. A lot of them also are connected to a central server, and changes can be made remotely. Next time you are stopped at a red light, look up for those cameras, or on the ground for those sensors (though sometimes new pavement can cover up these sensors, the sensors continue to work and are not damaged). The little cameras are NOT red light cameras. They are there to monitor traffic, and sophisticated software can change the signal according to the traffic.
Several new technologies have come to the traffic light industry, including those new pedestrian signals that count down how much time you have left.
Ever notice how an arrow does not come on when there is no car in the left turn lane? Thank the sensors for that, so that way there is not any wasted time by giving an arrow to non-existant left traffic etc.
Back on topic..
And yes, placing the AT&T boxes next to traffic controllers are a great idea. I have seen the Cox Cable boxes placed next to them here to 'blend in' as well, and this way, hopefully there would be lesser complaints. Sheesh, I wouldn't mind a box like that, as long as it meant cool new technology and IPTV. -- Joshua| About Me | |
|   DaBavarian Premium join:2006-02-22 Saginaw, MI
| I own my house, 100% of it. If AT&T felt inclined to put up VRAD next to house, no problems here. I'd be a happy techno pig.
The people who cry about these boxes are the people who don't use the technology i.e. cell phones. The only technology these people are using are the pacemakers their doctors gave em. | |
|  | |  |
|