en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to justin
Re: Question...
Most definately. |
|
justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY | reply to en102
yep that looks about right. Latency for icmp ping at 200ms would mean higher latency to completely fetch a null file. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to gdm
Tethered ZX-20 on AT&T 3G over bluetooth
Latency:313ms 312ms 344ms 1125ms 313ms 296ms 329ms 328ms 297ms 328ms
Speed: 499kbps
Latency is a bit high... but then again, I'm on the other side of the country
$ tracert i.dslr.net
Tracing route to i.dslr.net [209.123.109.176]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 149 ms 130 ms 151 ms 172.26.248.2
2 149 ms 156 ms 152 ms 172.26.248.2
3
$ ping i.dslr.net
PING i.dslr.net (209.123.109.177): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.123.109.177: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 209.123.109.177: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=203 ms
64 bytes from 209.123.109.177: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=218 ms
----i.dslr.net PING Statistics---- |
|
