<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18639675</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:41:31 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:41:31 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18645855</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : Yeah I found that interesting too recently. Verizon, Qwest, & Earthlink all require contracts for DSL discounts though, so it looks like it's industry wide as they focus more on retaining instead of nabbing grandmas...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18645855</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:59:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18645797</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Funny thing that.  AT&T (for example) no longer requires contracts to get the best pricing, while cable seems to be starting to require term agreements.  Curiouser and curiouser.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18645797</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:50:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18640195</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Right... you typically have to either threaten to leave, or have competition come by (Uverse?) before they'll react.<br><br>DirecTv offered my $10/month disount for 6 months if I kept a 1 year contract (no rate increases).  Works for me...<br>I already have the service, and this brings the cost of my 3 sets on DTV to $50/month.<br><SMALL>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18640195</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:28:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639675</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/730881"><b>raptor1418</b></A> : Why would they do anything for us loyal customers.   They already have us and don't worry about us until we want to cancel service.   <br><br>I have experienced this personally with both my ISP and Sat provider.   Both times (have done this twice with ISP and twice with Sat provider) I called and wanted to cancel and they dropped my rate or gave me a few months free to stay on.   <br><br>So in the end I actually got what a new customer got and the best part of it all is I told my sat provider up front that I wanted to pay the ETF over the phone right than and there to cancel my service.   That got the ball rolling with out me even having to say I would stay if they gave me a better deal.  Too bad I am still going to probably cancel in a few months anyway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639675</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:04:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639580</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Yup... funny thing is that at&t supposedly doesn't have any required contracts with Uverse either.<br><br>The way I see it...<br><br>Contacts:<br>Free (or cheap) installation, and low(er) prices.  ETF fees if you cancel.  Sometimes this can result in lower quality service, as you're 'stuck' for a term of eat the ETF<br><br>No-Contracts:<br>Installation fees (typically), low service to start up, prices will typically increase after a couple of months (3-6 months).<br><SMALL>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639580</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:50:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639248</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>I think the scramble for the low hanging fruit has ended<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Don't know about that.  I see contracts as a way for them to continue scrambling for that low hanging fruit without bleeding too badly when that fruit turns out to be rotten (unloyal, costly).<br><SMALL>--<br>Laser eye surgery rocks!  I love frickin' laser beams.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639248</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:56:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639190</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>For me, this is a big change in their business practices.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I saw a Time Warner commercial on TV just thismorning, touting "<B>NO</B> long term contracts!" with a nice graphic of a contract going through a shredder.  <br><br>Right now businesses seem to have the mentality that new customers are worth more than the loyal ones who are sticking with them.  I don't think this is right.  Rather than try and lock customers into contracts, how about <B>rewarding existing customers for their loyalty?</B><br><br>As it stands customers who really want to keep their bills low have to do a "new customer promo" bunny hop from provider to provider.  Providers then have to look to contracts to slow this sort of churn down.  I don't find it too surprising that cable is looking into this because they're about the only ones NOT doing this.<br><br>All that said, I definitely like the option of committing to a contract in exchange for lower bills.  Particularly if the contract gives a truly good value (as opposed to extortionate non-contract prices), and the ETF isn't too horrific.<br><SMALL>--<br>Laser eye surgery rocks!  I love frickin' laser beams.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18639190</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:45:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18638704</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : I think the scramble for the low hanging fruit has ended and they're just now interested in retaining the customers they already have....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18638704</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:28:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>feeling the pressure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18638700</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1215056"><b>chemaupr</b></A> : For me, this is a big change in their business practices. I guess they are finally "admitting" the FIOS threat.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18638700</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:27:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
